Literature DB >> 12407944

Proportional changes in cephalometric distances during Twin Block appliance therapy.

M J Trenouth1.   

Abstract

The aim of the study was to evaluate the cephalometric changes produced by the Twin Block appliance. Lateral cephalometric radiographs were taken before and after Twin Block appliance treatment on 30 consecutive patients (14 male, 16 female, mean age 12 years 6 months). Published normative data tables were used to produce control data, which were individually matched to the test group for age, sex, and treatment time. Alteration in shape was assessed by measuring percentage change in linear dimensions as opposed to change in cephalometric angles used in previous investigations. The differential average percentage change was calculated by subtracting the control value from the Twin Block value. Clinically significant changes (2 per cent and greater) were found in lower anterior (6.6 per cent) and posterior (4.6 per cent) face heights, upper incisor to maxillary plane (4.9 per cent), i.e. upper incisor retraction, and increase in mandibular length (Co-B 3.3 per cent, Co-Po 2.6 per cent, Ar-B 3.5 per cent, Ar-Po 2.2 per cent).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12407944     DOI: 10.1093/ejo/24.5.485

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthod        ISSN: 0141-5387            Impact factor:   3.075


  6 in total

1.  Three-dimensional skeletal, dentoalveolar and temporomandibular joint changes produced by Twin Block functional appliance.

Authors:  Hanem Younes Elfeky; Mona Salah Fayed; Maged Sultan Alhammadi; Sanaa Abou Zeid Soliman; Dalia Mohamed El Boghdadi
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Treatment effects of twin-block and mandibular protraction appliance-IV in the correction of class II malocclusion.

Authors:  Ashok Kumar Jena; Ritu Duggal
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Cephalometric evaluation of hyoid bone position and pharyngeal spaces following treatment with Twin block appliance.

Authors:  Geeta Verma; Pradeep Tandon; Amit Nagar; Gyan P Singh; Alka Singh
Journal:  J Orthod Sci       Date:  2012-07

4.  Comparison of Activator-Headgear and Twin Block Treatment Approaches in Class II Division 1 Malocclusion.

Authors:  Stjepan Spalj; Kate Mroz Tranesen; Kari Birkeland; Visnja Katic; Andrej Pavlic; Vaska Vandevska-Radunovic
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-01-22       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Comparison of skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of two different mandibular advancement methods: conventional technique vs aesthetic approach.

Authors:  Hasan Camcı; Farhad Salmanpour
Journal:  Eur Oral Res       Date:  2022-05-05

6.  Long-term dentoskeletal changes with the Bionator, Herbst, Twin Block, and MARA functional appliances.

Authors:  Nicole J Siara-Olds; Valmy Pangrazio-Kulbersh; Jeff Berger; Burcu Bayirli
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.079

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.