Literature DB >> 12407327

[Complications, sequellae and outcome of cervical conizations: evaluation of three surgical technics].

J L Brun1, A Youbi, C Hocké.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess complications and after-effects of conizations and follow-up of patients treated with 3 conization methods. Materials and methods. Two hundred and forty-one conizations were performed for cervical dysplasia using cold knife (100 cases), electric knife (39 cases) or loop electrosurgical excision (102 cases). Residual disease, post-operative bleeding, cervical stenosis and recurrences were assessed.
RESULTS: The height of the cone biopsy specimen was higher after cold knife conization (18.3 4.7 mm) and electric knife conization (18.4 0.7 mm) than after loop electrosurgical excision (12.8 3.5 mm) (P<0.001). However, the rate of positive margins for dysplasia was not significantly different: 7%, 8% and 14%, respectively. The rate of post-operative bleeding was 8%, 5% and 2%, respectively. The rate of cervical stenosis was 8%, 27% and 3%, respectively (P<0.001). The rate of recurrences was not significantly different: 8%, 15% and 11%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Taking into account the current trend not to repeat surgery systematically after positive margin conizations, the risk of bleeding after cold knife conization, the risk of stenosis after electric knife conization and excessive depth of cone excision, the loop electrosurgical procedure may be recommended as a first option to treat cervical dysplasia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12407327

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)        ISSN: 0150-9918


  6 in total

1.  See-and-Treat Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure for High-Grade Cervical Cytology: Are We Overtreating?

Authors:  Lindsay M Kuroki; Lauren M Bergeron; Feng Gao; Premal H Thaker; Leslie S Massad
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.925

2.  Prospective Comparison of Loop Excision under Colposcopic Guidance versus Vitom Guidance.

Authors:  G F Vercellino; V Chiantera; J Gaßmann; E Erdemoglu; I Drechsler; S Frangini; A Schneider; G Böhmer
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 2.915

3.  Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system placement for severe uterine cervical stenosis after conization: two case reports.

Authors:  Emi Motegi; Kiyoshi Hasegawa; Satoshi Kawai; Kaori Kiuchi; Nobuaki Kosaka; Yoshiko Mochizuki; Ichio Fukasawa
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2016-03-09

4.  Post-conization cervical stenosis treated with silicone catheter in microinvasive cervical cancer patient: A case report.

Authors:  Angela Musella; Giusi Santangelo; Laura Vertechy; Anna Di Pinto; Carolina Maria Sassu; Margherita Fischetti; Violante Di Donato; Giorgia Perniola; Innocenza Palaia; Pierluigi Benedetti Panici
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2020-02-06

5.  A randomized clinical trial of a new anti-cervical stenosis device after conization by loop electrosurgical excision.

Authors:  Marcelo de Andrade Vieira; Raphael Leonardo Cunha de Araújo; Carlos Eduardo Mattos da Cunha Andrade; Ronaldo Luis Schmidt; Agnaldo Lopes Filho; Ricardo Dos Reis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  TWENTY-YEAR EXPERIENCE WITH LARGE LOOP EXCISION OF THE TRANSFORMATION ZONE AT SESTRE MILOSRDNICE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL CENTRE.

Authors:  Dražan Butorac; Bernarda Škrtić; Marijo Čukelj; Krunoslav Kuna; Ivka Djaković
Journal:  Acta Clin Croat       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 0.780

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.