Literature DB >> 12407063

Using attitudinal indicators to explain the public's intention to have recourse to gamete donation and surrogacy.

Joannes E Chliaoutakis1, Sophia Koukouli, Maria Papadakaki.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although the donation and receipt of gametes has become an integral part of infertility management, previous research in the field of social attitudes and intention to use medical technologies is limited. This study aimed to investigate attitudinal indicators and their potential relationship with the public's intention to have recourse to gamete donation and surrogacy.
METHODS: A total of 365 individuals of reproductive age (49.3% men and 50.7% women) completed a questionnaire referring to their intention to receive or donate sperm/oocytes and their acceptance of becoming a commissioning couple or surrogate mother, and also to explore their attitudes towards gamete donation and surrogacy. Two attitudinal indicators emerged from the principal component analysis identifying (i). recipients' and donors' choice for anonymity, donors' renunciation of parental obligations and refusal of children's rights to know their biological parents and (ii). favourable attitudes towards legislative and financial measures to be adopted by the Government for the promotion of reproductive technologies.
RESULTS: It was found that the indicator of 'Donors Anonymity and Refusal of Children's Rights' (DARCR) and the 'Legislative and Financial Support' (LFS) scale are positively associated with intention to have recourse to Gamete Donation and Surrogacy (GDS) (regression coefficients 0.31 and 1.08 respectively). Moreover, among the other variables used in the analysis only the 'church attendance' variable is negatively related with reported rates of intention to have recourse to GDS (P = 0.029), suggesting that the more religious respondents are less willing to use GDS.
CONCLUSION: Social, legislative and financial implications provide a convenient rationale for adopting a favourable intention towards reproductive technologies. The findings of the present research should be given close consideration by policy makers and health education campaigns.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12407063     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/17.11.2995

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  10 in total

1.  Identifying the public's knowledge and intention to use human cloning in Greek urban areas.

Authors:  Georgia Tzamalouka; Pelagia Soultatou; Maria Papadakaki; Sevasti Chatzifotiou; Basil Tarlatzis; Joannes El Chliaoutakis
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Predicting human cloning acceptability: a national Greek survey on the beliefs of the public.

Authors:  Georgia S Tzamalouka; Maria Papadakaki; Pelagia Soultatou; Sevasti Chatzifotiou; Basil Tarlatzis; Joannes El Chliaoutakis
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  A Survey on Oocyte Donation: Turkish Fertile and Infertile Women's Opinions.

Authors:  Aygul Akyuz; Nese Sever; Emre Karasahin; Gulten Guvenc; Suzan Cek
Journal:  Int J Fertil Steril       Date:  2014-11-01

4.  Surrogate mother - praiseworthy or stigmatized: a qualitative study on perceptions of surrogacy in Assam, India.

Authors:  Anna Arvidsson; Polly Vauquline; Sara Johnsdotter; Birgitta Essén
Journal:  Glob Health Action       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 2.640

5.  The relationship of sociocultural beliefs and infertile couples' attitude toward reproductive donation: A descriptive-correlational study.

Authors:  Robab Latifnejad Roudsari; Hamideh Jafari; Ali Taghipour
Journal:  Int J Reprod Biomed       Date:  2018-06-13

6.  Mothers for Others: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis of Gestational Surrogates' Child Relinquishment Experiences.

Authors:  Austin P Ferolino; Mia Angelica D Camposo; Karla Christianne L Estaño; Jessa Marie R Tacbobo
Journal:  J Patient Exp       Date:  2020-01-15

7.  Non-commercial surrogacy: an account of patient management in the first Dutch Centre for IVF Surrogacy, from 1997 to 2004.

Authors:  Sylvia Dermout; Harry van de Wiel; Peter Heintz; Kees Jansen; Willem Ankum
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2009-11-27       Impact factor: 6.918

8.  Building Irish families through surrogacy: medical and judicial issues for the advanced reproductive technologies.

Authors:  Eric Scott Sills; Clifford M Healy
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 3.223

9.  Attitudes of Iranian infertile couples toward surrogacy.

Authors:  Ensiyeh Mohebbi Kian; Hedieh Riazi; Saeid Bashirian
Journal:  J Hum Reprod Sci       Date:  2014-01

10.  Development and Validation of Attitude toward Gestational Surrogacy Scale in Iranian Infertile Couples.

Authors:  Fatemeh Rahimi Kian; Afsaneh Zandi; Reza Omani Samani; Saman Maroufizadeh; Abbas Mehran
Journal:  Int J Fertil Steril       Date:  2016-04-05
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.