Literature DB >> 12406918

Evaluation of a workplace cardiovascular health promotion programme in the Republic of Ireland.

Ann McMahon1, Cecily C Kelleher, Geraldine Helly, Elaine Duffy.   

Abstract

This paper describes a comprehensive evaluation of the organizational impact of a workplace health promotion programme, in the context of a framework devised by Nutbeam in 1998. The Happy Heart at Work programme, sponsored by the Irish Heart Foundation, has been in existence for 10 years and aims to promote a healthy lifestyle through specially devised modular materials. A postal census survey of 785 valid registered sites expressing any level of initial interest in the programme yielded a 40% response rate (n = 311). Of these, 194 (63%) were currently active and 114 were not. Active organizations were less likely to be Irish owned (54.5% versus 71.4%, p < 0.05), and more likely to operate in shifts (72.3% versus 51.1%, p < 0.05) or to have an occupational physician amongst the staff (36.9% versus 31%). Programme impact within active organizations, based on pre-defined Health Promoting Workplace parameters, was documented. There was agreement in the questionnaire responses that participating organizations promote a smoke-free environment (mean rating on five-point scale = 4.42), employee health and well-being (4.21) and good nutritional practice (4.11). Triangulation of research methods, including a telephone survey of gatekeepers from within organizations (n = 18), focus groups with participant employees (n = 42) and a review of the staff opinions of the facilitating organization on the programme, all showed strong concordance with respect to the strengths and weaknesses of Happy Heart at Work. The programme was felt to help improve employees' lifestyle habits and morale, as well as the company's public image. The main drawbacks of the programme were its relatively low profile, even in actively participating organizations, and the fact that it was not seen to be independently sustainable without intensive and ongoing support.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12406918     DOI: 10.1093/heapro/17.4.297

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Promot Int        ISSN: 0957-4824            Impact factor:   2.483


  6 in total

1.  Assessing quality of a worksite health promotion programme from participants' views: findings from a qualitative study in Malaysia.

Authors:  Siow-Yen Liau; Mohamed-Azmi A Hassali; Asrul A Shafie; Mohamed-Izham M Ibrahim
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Worksite tobacco prevention in the Canton of Zurich: stages of change, predictors, and outcomes.

Authors:  Verena Friedrich; Adrian Brügger; Georg Bauer
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2009-10-10       Impact factor: 3.380

3.  Prevalence of metabolic syndrome and related factors in Taiwanese high-tech industry workers.

Authors:  Tzung-Yi Tsai; Jung-Feng Cheng; Yu-Min Lai
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.365

Review 4.  Interventions for promoting physical activity.

Authors:  M Hillsdon; C Foster; M Thorogood
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2005-01-25

5.  Hypertension control in industrial employees: findings from SHIMSCO study.

Authors:  Ali Reza Khosravi; Mohsen Rowzati; Mojgan Gharipour; Mohammad Gholami Fesharaki; Shahin Shirani; Shahnaz Shahrokhi; Mahnaz Jozan; Elham Khosravi; Zahra Khosravi; Nizal Sarrafzadegan
Journal:  ARYA Atheroscler       Date:  2012

6.  Effects of 5-year interventions on cardiovascular risk factors of factories and offies employees of isfahan and najafabad: worksite intervention project-isfahan healthy heart program.

Authors:  Maryam Boshtam; Nizal Sarafzadegan; Karim Zare; Shahriar Sadeghi; Firoozeh Sajjadi; Katayoun Rabiei; Mansoreh Boshtam
Journal:  ARYA Atheroscler       Date:  2010
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.