Literature DB >> 12406355

Quantitative evaluation of the diagnostic thinking process in medical students.

Yoshinori Noguchi1, Kunihiko Matsui, Hiroshi Imura, Masatomo Kiyota, Tuguya Fukui.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore the diagnostic thinking process of medical students. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Two hundred twenty-four medical students were presented with 3 clinical scenarios corresponding to high, low, and intermediate pre-test probability of coronary artery disease. Estimates of test characteristics of the exercise stress test, and pre-test and post-test probability for each scenario were elicited from the students (intuitive estimates) and from the literature (reference estimates). Post-test probabilities were calculated using Bayes' theorem based upon the intuitive estimates (Bayesian estimates of post-test probability) and upon the reference estimates (reference estimates of post-test probability). The differences between the reference estimates and the intuitive estimates, and between Bayesian estimates and the intuitive estimates were used for assessing knowledge of test characteristics, and ability of estimating pre-test and post-test probability of disease.
RESULTS: Medical students could not rule out disease in low or intermediate pre-test probability settings, mainly because of poor pre-test estimates of disease probability. They were also easily confused by test results that differed from their anticipated results, probably because of their inaptitude in applying Bayes' theorem to real clinical situations. These diagnostic thinking patterns account for medical students or novice physicians repeating unnecessary examinations.
CONCLUSIONS: Medical students' diagnostic ability may be enhanced by the following educational strategies: 1) emphasizing the importance of ruling out disease in clinical practice, 2) training in the estimation of pre-test disease probability based upon history and physical examination, and 3) incorporation of the Bayesian probabilistic thinking and its application to real clinical situations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12406355      PMCID: PMC1495132          DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.20139.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  8 in total

1.  Diagnosis: highlighting the gaps.

Authors:  Sharon E Straus
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  A traditionally administered short course failed to improve medical students' diagnostic performance. A quantitative evaluation of diagnostic thinking.

Authors:  Yoshinori Noguchi; Kunihiko Matsui; Hiroshi Imura; Masatomo Kiyota; Tsuguya Fukui
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 3.  Evidence based diagnosis: does the language reflect the theory?

Authors:  Matt T Bianchi; Brian M Alexander
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-08-26

4.  Physician Bayesian updating from personal beliefs about the base rate and likelihood ratio.

Authors:  Benjamin Margolin Rottman
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-02

5.  Propagation of uncertainty in Bayesian diagnostic test interpretation.

Authors:  Preethi Srinivasan; M Brandon Westover; Matt T Bianchi
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 0.954

6.  Screening patients for gastric cancer: art and science are better together.

Authors:  Noriya Uedo
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol       Date:  2014

7.  Preliminary report of a Web-based instrument to assess and teach knowledge and clinical thinking to medical student.

Authors:  Gerald H Stein; Hironobu Tokunaga; Hirotaka Ando; Mikako Obika; Tomoko Miyoshi; Yasuharu Tokuda; Miho Bautista; Hitomi Kataoka; Hidekazu Terasawa
Journal:  Int J Med Educ       Date:  2014-01-04

Review 8.  How well do health professionals interpret diagnostic information? A systematic review.

Authors:  Penny F Whiting; Clare Davenport; Catherine Jameson; Margaret Burke; Jonathan A C Sterne; Chris Hyde; Yoav Ben-Shlomo
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 2.692

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.