Literature DB >> 12406070

Lupus anticoagulant testing: improvements in performance in a UK NEQAS proficiency testing exercise after dissemination of national guidelines on laboratory methods.

Ian Jennings1, Mike Greaves, Ian J Mackie, Steve Kitchen, Timothy A L Woods, F Eric Preston.   

Abstract

Laboratory screening for lupus anticoagulant (LA) has been shown to be suboptimal in several studies. Guidelines have recently been published by an expert group for the British Committee for Standards in Haematology, in an attempt to standardize and improve screening procedures. The value of using screening tests conforming with these guidelines was investigated in a United Kingdom National External Quality Assessment Scheme (UK NEQAS) proficiency testing exercise. The correct diagnosis was achieved by 97% of laboratories for a LA-negative sample. However, 18.3% of centres reported a false-negative result for a sample from a LA-positive subject. A significantly higher proportion of centres that used methods conforming with the published guidelines achieved the correct diagnosis for this sample (P < 0.002, chi-square test). A wide variety of screening tests were used by laboratories in this study. Within-method agreement could be improved by the use of a common normal pooled plasma to determine ratios. However, between-method agreement was not improved by this procedure. We conclude that adoption of methods compliant with national guidelines may improve the diagnosis of LA. There is a need, however, for reference and standardization materials to ensure further improvement in the accuracy of LA methods.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12406070     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2002.03821.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Haematol        ISSN: 0007-1048            Impact factor:   6.998


  5 in total

1.  Screening: Guidelines for antiphospholipid antibody detection.

Authors:  Philip G de Groot; Rolf T Urbanus
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 20.543

2.  Lupus anticoagulant testing and anticoagulation do not mix: quantitation of discrepant results and potential approaches to reduce false positives.

Authors:  Jocelyn B Chandler; Richard Torres; Henry M Rinder; Christopher A Tormey
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 6.998

3.  Combining Taipan snake venom time/Ecarin time screening with the mixing studies of conventional assays increases detection rates of lupus anticoagulants in orally anticoagulated patients.

Authors:  Gary W Moore
Journal:  Thromb J       Date:  2007-09-06

4.  Current practices for lupus anticoagulant testing at a tertiary care hospital and impact on laboratory resources.

Authors:  Mansour Semar Aljabry
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.526

5.  Lupus anticoagulant mixing tests for multiple reagents are more sensitive if interpreted with a mixing test-specific cut-off than index of circulating anticoagulant.

Authors:  Osamu Kumano; Gary W Moore
Journal:  Res Pract Thromb Haemost       Date:  2017-12-23
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.