Literature DB >> 1240591

A comparison of the 8-azaguanine and ouabain-resistance systems for the selection of induced mutant Chinese hamster cells.

C F Arlett, D Turnbull, S A Harcourt, A R Lehmann, C M Colella.   

Abstract

The forward mutation selection system based on resistance to 8-azaguanine has been widely used with cells cultured from a diversity of species and with a variety of mutagens. Ouabain resistance is an alternative selective system. Both systems show a substantial influence of expression time on the number of resistant variants observed after addition of the selective agent such that the frequency reaches a maximum which is dose dependent, and then declines rapidly. Metabolic cooperation has been propsed as the mechanism responsible for this decline with the 8-azaguanine system, but it is less likely to account for the loss of ouabain-resistant variants where it is necessary to invoke generalised effects on the viability of variants due to overcrowding on the plates. A comparison of the two selective systems showed that, with the exception of gamma-irradiation, which was apparently non-mutagenic in the ouabain system, there was broad agreement between the two systems for each mutagen tested. Ethyl methanesulphonate was the most efficient mutagen by a substantial factor. Ouabain resistance permitted greater discrimination particularly between weak mutagens because of the low frequency of spontaneous variants (4 x 10(-7) and also produced data with less intrinsic variability. The absence of gamma ray induced mutation in the ouabain system shows that it may fail to detect certain types of mutagens. Thus the two systems should be used to complement each other. Mutation by the fungicide captan was evaluated using both systems and the positive results indicate that it may pose a hazard to man.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1975        PMID: 1240591     DOI: 10.1016/0027-5107(75)90202-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  21 in total

1.  Variants of soybean cells which can grow in suspension with maltose as a carbon-energy source.

Authors:  M Limberg; D Cress; K G Lark
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1979-04       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 2.  The activation of beta-substituted nitrosamines that are carcinogenic to the pancreas.

Authors:  T Lawson; D Nagel; D Rogers
Journal:  Int J Pancreatol       Date:  1991-09

3.  Base substitutions, frameshifts, and small deletions constitute ionizing radiation-induced point mutations in mammalian cells.

Authors:  A J Grosovsky; J G de Boer; P J de Jong; E A Drobetsky; B W Glickman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Chemical carcinogens produce mutations to ouabain resistance in transformable C3H/10T1/2 Cl 8 mouse fibroblasts.

Authors:  J R Landolph; C Heidelberger
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1979-02       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Toxicity of ouabain on Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  H Beikirch
Journal:  Experientia       Date:  1977-04-15

6.  Chemical carcinogens transform BHK cells by inducing a recessive mutation.

Authors:  N Bouck; G di Mayorca
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 4.272

7.  Isolation of diploid human lymphoblast mutants presumably homozygous for ouabain resistance.

Authors:  W N Choy; J W Littlefield
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Postreplication repair and the susceptibility of Chinese hamster cells to cytotoxic and mutagenic effects of alkylating agents.

Authors:  J Friedman; E Huberman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Mutagenesis in S49 mouse lymphoma cells: induction of resistance to ouabain, 6-thioguanine, and dibutyryl cyclic AMP.

Authors:  U Friedrich; P Coffino
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1977-02       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Induction of ouabain-resistant mutations in C3H 10T1/2 mouse cells by ultraviolet light.

Authors:  G L Chan; J B Little
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.