Literature DB >> 12405589

Identification of cross-sectional parameters of lateral meniscal allografts that predict tibial contact pressure in human cadaveric knees.

Arthur Huang1, M L Hull, Stephen M Howell, Tammy Haut Donahue.   

Abstract

To guide the development of improved procedures for selecting meniscal allografts, the objective of this study was to identify which cross-sectional parameters of a lateral meniscal allograft predict the contact pressure of the articular surface of the tibia. To meet the objective, the contact pressure of the articular surface of the tibia was measured with a lateral meniscal autograft and a lateral meniscal allograft using pressure sensitive film in 15 fresh-frozen human cadaveric knees. Allografts were matched only in transverse dimensions to the autograft but not in cross-sectional dimensions. Knees were loaded to 1200 N in compression at flexion angles of 0, 15, 30 and 45 degrees using a load application system that allowed unconstrained motion in the remaining degrees of freedom. Five cross-sectional parameters for both of the grafts in each of the anterior, middle, and posterior regions were derived from measurements obtained using a laser-based non-contacting three-dimensional coordinate digitizing system (3-DCDS) (Haut et al., J. Orthop Res, 2000). Five contact variables (i.e. the maximum pressure, mean pressure, contact area, and anterior-posterior and medial-lateral locations of the centroid of contact area) were determined from the pressure sensitive film. When each allograft was paired with the corresponding autograft, the root mean squared percent differences for the cross-sectional parameters ranged from a minimum of 28% for the width of the posterior region to 572% for the height of the posterior region. The root mean squared percent differences between the contact variables for paired grafts were 29% for the maximum pressure, 19% for the mean pressure, and 24% for the contact area. Differences in the cross-sectional parameters between the grafts were related to differences in the contact variables using regression analysis. Difference in the width was most often a predictor variable in the regression models with R2 values > or = 0.45. Differences in all of the four remaining cross-sectional parameters were also important predictor variables. Because failure to match cross-sectional parameters causes substantial difference in contact variables between an allograft and autograft and because cross-sectional parameters predict the contact pressure on the tibial plateau, protocols used to prospectively select allografts should concentrate on matching cross-sectional parameters and particularly the width to those of the original meniscus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12405589     DOI: 10.1115/1.1503061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech Eng        ISSN: 0148-0731            Impact factor:   2.097


  12 in total

1.  The influence of pre-tensioning of meniscal transplants on the tibiofemoral contact area.

Authors:  G von Lewinski; C Hurschler; C Allmann; C J Wirth
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2005-11-22       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Quantification of meniscal volume by segmentation of 3T magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  Megan E Bowers; Glenn A Tung; Braden C Fleming; Joseph J Crisco; Jesus Rey
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2007-03-27       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  An optical method for evaluation of geometric fidelity for anatomically shaped tissue-engineered constructs.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Ballyns; Daniel L Cohen; Evan Malone; Suzanne A Maher; Hollis G Potter; Timothy Wright; Hod Lipson; Lawrence J Bonassar
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.056

Review 4.  A systematic review of the incidence and clinical significance of postoperative meniscus transplant extrusion.

Authors:  Frank R Noyes; Sue D Barber-Westin
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Semi-automated segmentation to assess the lateral meniscus in normal and osteoarthritic knees.

Authors:  M S Swanson; J W Prescott; T M Best; K Powell; R D Jackson; F Haq; M N Gurcan
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2009-11-05       Impact factor: 6.576

6.  Variations of cross-sectional meniscal morphology between similar-sized menisci: implications on donor selection for meniscal allograft transplantation.

Authors:  Melih Unal; Cemil Aktan; Ali Levent; Mustafa Cetin; Ozkan Kose; Levent Sarikcioglu
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 3.067

7.  The influence of a change in the meniscus cross-sectional shape on the medio-lateral translation of the knee joint and meniscal extrusion.

Authors:  Piotr Luczkiewicz; Karol Daszkiewicz; Wojciech Witkowski; Jacek Chróścielewski; Tomasz Ferenc; Boguslaw Baczkowski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Should the meniscal height be considered for preoperative sizing in meniscal transplantation?

Authors:  Alfredo Dos Santos Netto; Camila Cohen Kaleka; Mariana Kei Toma; Julio Cesar de Almeida E Silva; Ricardo de Paula Leite Cury; Patricia Maria de Moraes Barros Fucs; Nilson Roberto Severino
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 9.  Image-guided tissue engineering.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Ballyns; Lawrence J Bonassar
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2009-07-06       Impact factor: 5.310

10.  The Meniscus-Deficient Knee: Biomechanics, Evaluation, and Treatment Options.

Authors:  Allison J Rao; Brandon J Erickson; Gregory L Cvetanovich; Adam B Yanke; Bernard R Bach; Brian J Cole
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2015-10-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.