Literature DB >> 12405516

Apomorphine susceptibility and animal models for psychopathology: genes and environment.

Bart A Ellenbroek1, Alexander R Cools.   

Abstract

Many years ago we found a bimodal distribution of a number of different behaviors in our regular outbred Wistar stock. This was observed in the response to novelty, the response in a resident-intruder test as well as in the stereotypy response to the dopamine agonist apomorphine. On the basis of that, we decided to selectively breed these animals, which resulted in the the APO-SUS and APO-UNSUS lines. The APO-SUS rats show a strong, stereotyped gnawing response, whereas APO-UNSUS show only a weak gnawing response. Follow-up studies have shown that the phenotypical expression of these rats depend on genetic and early and late environmental factors. Because these rats were not selected on the basis of a specific behavioral trait, but rather on the basis of a difference in susceptibility for a specific neurotransmitter, it is not surprising that these animals show major differences in the neurochemical state of the central nervous system. In fact, in many respects they represent mirror images of each other. Moreover, these animals show clear differences in their endocrine and immunological systems. APO-SUS rats can be characterized as having a hyper-reactive hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis, and a dominance of the T(H2) system. Apart from discussing the main differences between APO-SUS and APO-UNSUS rats, the review specifically focuses on the former as a potential model for schizophrenia. We have been able to show that APO-SUS rats indeed share a large number of behavioral, neurochemical, endocrinological, and immunological similarities with patients suffering from schizophrenia. Because schizophrenia is also likely to result from an interaction between genetic and early stressful life events, the APO-SUS rat might represent a promising animal model for studying this severe mental disorder.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12405516     DOI: 10.1023/a:1020214322065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Genet        ISSN: 0001-8244            Impact factor:   2.805


  21 in total

1.  Animal models of gene-environment interactions in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Yavuz Ayhan; Akira Sawa; Christopher A Ross; Mikhail V Pletnikov
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2009-04-18       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 2.  Animal models of gene-environment interaction in schizophrenia: A dimensional perspective.

Authors:  Yavuz Ayhan; Ross McFarland; Mikhail V Pletnikov
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2015-10-25       Impact factor: 11.685

3.  Alexander Rudolf Cools (1942-2013).

Authors:  Bart A Ellenbroek; Judith Homberg; Michel Verheij; Will Spooren; Ruud van den Bos; Gerard Martens
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 4.  Animal models of schizophrenia.

Authors:  C A Jones; D J G Watson; K C F Fone
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 5.  The three-hit concept of vulnerability and resilience: toward understanding adaptation to early-life adversity outcome.

Authors:  Nikolaos P Daskalakis; Rosemary C Bagot; Karen J Parker; Christiaan H Vinkers; E R de Kloet
Journal:  Psychoneuroendocrinology       Date:  2013-07-07       Impact factor: 4.905

6.  High-novelty-preference rats are predisposed to compulsive cocaine self-administration.

Authors:  David Belin; Nadège Berson; Eric Balado; Pier Vincenzo Piazza; Véronique Deroche-Gamonet
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 7.853

7.  Differences in the cellular mechanism underlying the effects of amphetamine on prepulse inhibition in apomorphine-susceptible and apomorphine-unsusceptible rats.

Authors:  Martine C J van der Elst; Yvette S Wunderink; Bart A Ellenbroek; Alexander R Cools
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2006-10-10       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Effects of white and infrared lighting on apomorphine-induced pecking in pigeons.

Authors:  Jonathan W Pinkston; Gregory J Madden; Stephen C Fowler
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.293

9.  Learning strategies during fear conditioning.

Authors:  Russ E Carpenter; Cliff H Summers
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.877

10.  Individual differences in the sensitivity to serotonergic drugs: a pharmacobehavioural approach using rats selected on the basis of their response to novelty.

Authors:  Michel M M Verheij; Jesse V Veenvliet; Tom Groot Kormelink; Maaike Steenhof; Alexander R Cools
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 4.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.