Literature DB >> 12405140

Logic and human reasoning: an assessment of the deduction paradigm.

Jonathan St B T Evans1.   

Abstract

The study of deductive reasoning has been a major paradigm in psychology for approximately the past 40 years. Research has shown that people make many logical errors on such tasks and are strongly influenced by problem content and context. It is argued that this paradigm was developed in a context of logicist thinking that is now outmoded. Few reasoning researchers still believe that logic is an appropriate normative system for most human reasoning, let alone a model for describing the process of human reasoning, and many use the paradigm principally to study pragmatic and probabilistic processes. It is suggested that the methods used for studying reasoning be reviewed, especially the instructional context, which necessarily defines pragmatic influences as biases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12405140     DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.128.6.978

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Bull        ISSN: 0033-2909            Impact factor:   17.737


  25 in total

1.  Inference suppression and semantic memory retrieval: every counterexample counts.

Authors:  Wim De Neys; Walter Schaeken; Géry d'Ydewalle
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-06

Review 2.  A cognitive neuroscience framework for understanding causal reasoning and the law.

Authors:  Jonathan A Fugelsang; Kevin N Dunbar
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2004-11-29       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  An evaluation of dual-process theories of reasoning.

Authors:  Magda Osman
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-12

Review 4.  The heuristic-analytic theory of reasoning: extension and evaluation.

Authors:  Jonathan St B T Evans
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-06

5.  Source credibility and syllogistic reasoning.

Authors:  David E Copeland; Kris Gunawan; Nicole J Bies-Hernandez
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-01

6.  Evidence to Decision framework provides a structured "roadmap" for making GRADE guidelines recommendations.

Authors:  Shelly-Anne Li; Paul E Alexander; Tea Reljic; Adam Cuker; Robby Nieuwlaat; Wojtek Wiercioch; Gordon Guyatt; Holger J Schünemann; Benjamin Djulbegovic
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2018-09-22       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 7.  Structured decision-making drives guidelines panels' recommendations "for" but not "against" health interventions.

Authors:  Benjamin Djulbegovic; Tea Reljic; Shira Elqayam; Adam Cuker; Iztok Hozo; Qi Zhou; Shelly-Anne Li; Paul Alexander; Robby Nieuwlaat; Wojtek Wiercioch; Holger Schünemann; Gordon Guyatt
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2019-02-16       Impact factor: 6.437

8.  Defeasible reasoning with legal conditionals.

Authors:  Lupita Estefania Gazzo Castañeda; Markus Knauff
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-04

9.  Pre-screening workers to overcome bias amplification in online labour markets.

Authors:  Ans Vercammen; Alexandru Marcoci; Mark Burgman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  General aptitude and the assumption of truth in deductively rational reasoning about probable but false antecedent to consequent relations.

Authors:  Walter Schroyens; Lieve Fleerackers; Sunile Maes
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2010-12-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.