Literature DB >> 12405046

Who decides? A look at ethics committee membership.

Raymond De Vries1, Carl P Forsberg.   

Abstract

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research

Mesh：

Year:  2002        PMID： 12405046     DOI： 10.1023/a:1020581131605

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HEC Forum        ISSN： 0956-2737


× No keyword cloud information.
  7 in total

1.  Institutional ethics committees. Committee on Bioethics.

Authors: 
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  Are ethics committee members competent to consult?

Authors:  D Hoffmann; A Tarzian; J A O'Neil
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.718

3.  Clinical ethics committees.

Authors:  A M Slowther; T Hope
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-09-16

4.  A survey of university institutional review boards: characteristics, policies, and procedures.

Authors:  Gregory J Hayes; Steven C Hayes; Thane Dykstra
Journal:  IRB       Date:  1995 May-Jun

5.  Unnecessary holes in the head.

Authors:  G R Gillett
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec

6.  Ethics committees: impediments to research or guardians of ethical standards?

Authors:  A E While
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-09-09

Review 7.  Conflict of interest and institutional review boards.

Authors:  M K Cho; P Billings
Journal:  J Investig Med       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 2.895
  7 in total
  8 in total

1.  Assessing physicians' roles on health care ethics committees.

Authors:  Charlotte McDaniel
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2010-12

2.  Informing research participants of research results: analysis of Canadian university based research ethics board policies.

Authors:  S D Macneil; C V Fernandez
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Confidentiality, secrecy and privacy in ethics consultation.

Authors:  Gerald Neitzke
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2007-12

Review 4.  Reviewing HIV-Related Research in Emerging Economies: The Role of Government Reviewing Agencies.

Authors:  Patrina Sexton; Katrina Hui; Donna Hanrahan; Mark Barnes; Jeremy Sugarman; Alex John London; Robert Klitzman
Journal:  Dev World Bioeth       Date:  2014-11-10       Impact factor: 2.294

5.  Understanding community-based processes for research ethics review: a national study.

Authors:  Nancy Shore; Ruta Brazauskas; Elaine Drew; Kristine A Wong; Lisa Moy; Andrea Corage Baden; Kirsten Cyr; Jocelyn Ulevicus; Sarena D Seifer
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Factors influencing the effectiveness of research ethics committees.

Authors:  C A Schuppli; D Fraser
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.903

7.  Barriers to Effective Deliberation in Clinical Research Oversight.

Authors:  Danielle M Wenner
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2016-09

8.  How IRBs view and make decisions about consent forms.

Authors:  Robert L Klitzman
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.742
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.