BACKGROUND: Studies on the effects of anaesthesia on event-related potentials and long latency auditory-evoked potentials (AEP) are sparse. Both provide information on cortical processing and may have potential as monitors of awareness. We studied the effect of propofol on the event-related potential mismatch negativity (MMN) and the long-latency AEP NI. METHODS: Twenty-one patients received 1 microgram ml-1 stepped increases in the target concentration of propofol using Diprifusor until a maximum of 6 micrograms ml-1 was achieved or the patient had lost consciousness. Neurophysiological responses (MMN and N1) and the patients' level of consciousness were recorded before the administration of propofol and at a target effector site concentration of propofol of 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 micrograms ml-1. Grand average evoked potentials were computed at baseline, before the administration of propofol (A); at the highest propofol concentration at which each patient was responsive (B); and at the concentration of propofol at which the patient became unconscious (C). RESULTS: Patients lost consciousness at different target concentrations of propofol, all being unresponsive by 4 micrograms ml-1. The response to the deviant stimuli used to elicit duration-shift MMN was significantly more negative than to the standard stimuli at A (mean difference 2.58 microV, P = 0.0011) but this difference was virtually abolished at point B, before the patients lost consciousness (mean difference 0.63 microV, P = ns). The amplitude of N1 evoked by standard stimuli was negative compared with electrical baseline at both point A (mean amplitude -3.81 microV, P < 0.001) and at point B (mean amplitude -2.2 microV, P = 0.002), but was no longer significantly different to baseline at point C (mean amplitude 0.51 microV, P = ns). The change in the mean amplitude of N1 from last awake (point B) to first unconscious (point C) was also significant (mean difference in amplitude 1.69 microV, P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: MMN is unlikely to be a clinically useful tool to detect awareness in surgical patients. In contrast, the loss of N1 may identify the transition from consciousness to unconsciousness and deserves further study.
BACKGROUND: Studies on the effects of anaesthesia on event-related potentials and long latency auditory-evoked potentials (AEP) are sparse. Both provide information on cortical processing and may have potential as monitors of awareness. We studied the effect of propofol on the event-related potential mismatch negativity (MMN) and the long-latency AEP NI. METHODS: Twenty-one patients received 1 microgram ml-1 stepped increases in the target concentration of propofol using Diprifusor until a maximum of 6 micrograms ml-1 was achieved or the patient had lost consciousness. Neurophysiological responses (MMN and N1) and the patients' level of consciousness were recorded before the administration of propofol and at a target effector site concentration of propofol of 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 micrograms ml-1. Grand average evoked potentials were computed at baseline, before the administration of propofol (A); at the highest propofol concentration at which each patient was responsive (B); and at the concentration of propofol at which the patient became unconscious (C). RESULTS:Patients lost consciousness at different target concentrations of propofol, all being unresponsive by 4 micrograms ml-1. The response to the deviant stimuli used to elicit duration-shift MMN was significantly more negative than to the standard stimuli at A (mean difference 2.58 microV, P = 0.0011) but this difference was virtually abolished at point B, before the patients lost consciousness (mean difference 0.63 microV, P = ns). The amplitude of N1 evoked by standard stimuli was negative compared with electrical baseline at both point A (mean amplitude -3.81 microV, P < 0.001) and at point B (mean amplitude -2.2 microV, P = 0.002), but was no longer significantly different to baseline at point C (mean amplitude 0.51 microV, P = ns). The change in the mean amplitude of N1 from last awake (point B) to first unconscious (point C) was also significant (mean difference in amplitude 1.69 microV, P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: MMN is unlikely to be a clinically useful tool to detect awareness in surgical patients. In contrast, the loss of N1 may identify the transition from consciousness to unconsciousness and deserves further study.
Authors: Heidi Yppärilä; Ikka Korhonen; Mika Tarvainen; Tadeusz Musialowicz; Stephan M Jakob; Juhani Partanen Journal: J Clin Monit Comput Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 2.502
Authors: Kirill V Nourski; Mitchell Steinschneider; Ariane E Rhone; Hiroto Kawasaki; Matthew A Howard; Matthew I Banks Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2018-08-20 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Kirill V Nourski; Matthew I Banks; Mitchell Steinschneider; Ariane E Rhone; Hiroto Kawasaki; Rashmi N Mueller; Michael M Todd; Matthew A Howard Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2017-02-27 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Kirill V Nourski; Mitchell Steinschneider; Ariane E Rhone; Bryan M Krause; Hiroto Kawasaki; Matthew I Banks Journal: Hear Res Date: 2020-02-11 Impact factor: 3.208