Literature DB >> 12402618

Usefulness of bioelectrical impedance analysis in monitoring nutrition status and survival of peritoneal dialysis patients.

Paul A Fein1, Gopi Gundumalla, Arletha Jorden, Betty Matza, Jyotiprakas Chattopadhyay, Morrell M Avram.   

Abstract

Malnutrition is highly prevalent in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients and is associated with higher mortality. Lower serum levels of markers of nutrition--such as albumin, creatinine, prealbumin, and total cholesterol--are important risk factors in PD patients. Usefulness of bioimpedance analysis (BIA) in hemodialysis (HD) patients has been reported. In the present study, we prospectively examined the relationship of bioimpedance indexes to the nutrition status and survival of 45 PD patients who were followed for more than 1 year. On patient enrollment, a BIA was performed (Bioelectrical Impedance Analyzer, Model BIA-101: RJL Systems, Clinton Township, MI, U.S.A.). Monthly blood was analyzed for biochemical markers. The mean age of the study group was 50 +/- 15 years. Of the 45 patients, 56% were female and 24% were diabetic. Mean body mass index was 25.7 +/- 5.1. Mean resistance, reactance, capacitance, and phase angle were 524 +/- 106 omega 57 +/- 20 omega, 678 +/- 223 pF, and 6.2 +/- 1.7 degrees respectively. Patients with diabetes had lower capacitance (555 pF vs. 713 pF, p = 0.007) and phase angle (5.35 degrees vs. 6.4 degrees, p = 0.05) than patients without diabetes. During the study period, 4 patients died. Patients who survived had higher capacitance (486 +/- 163 pF vs. 697 +/- 218 pF, p = 0.07) and phase angle (4.65 +/- 0.73 degrees, vs. 6.34 +/- 1.67 degrees, p = 0.008) than those who did not survive. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to compute observed survival. The cumulative observed survival of PD patients with an enrollment phase angle > or = 6 degrees was significantly (p = 0.01) higher than that of patients with an enrollment phase angle < 6 degrees. Reactance was directly correlated with albumin (r = 0.52, p < 0.0001) and total protein (r = 0.44, p < 0.05). Capacitance was directly correlated with body mass index (r = 0.35, p < 0.05), albumin (r = 0.32, p < 0.05), and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) (r = 0.44, p < 0.01), and inversely correlated with body weight (r = -0.51, p < 0.0001). Phase angle was directly correlated with all of the biochemical markers of nutrition, such as albumin (r = 0.54, p < 0.01), total protein (r = 0.38, p < 0.05), creatinine (r = 0.28, p < 0.01), and BUN (r = 0.39, p < 0.05). By stepwise multivariate regression analysis, body weight (beta = -0.60, p < 0.0001) and total protein (beta = 0.32, p = 0.012) were significant determinants of resistance. Body weight (beta = -0.31, p = 0.02) and albumin (beta = 0.59, p < 0.0001) were significant predictors of reactance. Serum albumin (beta = 0.53, p < 0.0001) was the only best predictor of phase angle in PD patients. The BIA indices reflect nutrition status in PD patients, and may be useful in monitoring nutrition interventions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12402618

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Perit Dial        ISSN: 1197-8554


  16 in total

1.  [Bioelectric impedance analysis in the diagnosis of malnutrition].

Authors:  R Wirth; P Miklis
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.281

2.  Associations between bioelectrical impedance parameters and cardiovascular events in chronic dialysis patients.

Authors:  Aline de Araujo Antunes; Francieli Delatim Vannini; Liciana Vaz de Arruda Silveira; Pasqual Barretti; Luis Cuadrado Martin; Jacqueline Costa Teixeira Caramori
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2012-12-04       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  Factors associated with depression and anxiety in patients with end-stage renal disease receiving maintenance hemodialysis.

Authors:  Yue Hou; Xiujiang Li; Lizhi Yang; Chang Liu; Hao Wu; Ying Xu; Fan Yang; Yujun Du
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  Phase angle, frailty and mortality in older adults.

Authors:  Emilee R Wilhelm-Leen; Yoshio N Hall; Ralph I Horwitz; Glenn M Chertow
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Phase Angle Is a Useful indicator for Muscle Function in Older Adults.

Authors:  M Yamada; Y Kimura; D Ishiyama; N Nishio; Y Otobe; T Tanaka; S Ohji; S Koyama; A Sato; M Suzuki; H Ogawa; T Ichikawa; D Ito; H Arai
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 4.075

6.  Standardized phase angle from bioelectrical impedance analysis as prognostic factor for survival in patients with cancer.

Authors:  Silvana Iturriet Paiva; Lúcia R Borges; Denise Halpern-Silveira; M Cecília F Assunção; Aluisio J D Barros; M Cristina Gonzalez
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Bioelectrical impedance analysis in clinical practice: implications for hepatitis C therapy BIA and hepatitis C.

Authors:  Alisan Kahraman; Johannes Hilsenbeck; Monika Nyga; Judith Ertle; Alexander Wree; Mathias Plauth; Guido Gerken; Ali E Canbay
Journal:  Virol J       Date:  2010-08-16       Impact factor: 4.099

8.  Use of bioelectrical impedance analysis for the assessment of nutritional status in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Yoojin Lee; Oran Kwon; Cheung Soo Shin; Song Mi Lee
Journal:  Clin Nutr Res       Date:  2015-01-23

9.  Bioelectrical impedance phase angle in clinical practice: implications for prognosis in stage IIIB and IV non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Digant Gupta; Carolyn A Lammersfeld; Pankaj G Vashi; Jessica King; Sadie L Dahlk; James F Grutsch; Christopher G Lis
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-01-28       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Bioelectrical impedance phase angle as a prognostic indicator in breast cancer.

Authors:  Digant Gupta; Carolyn A Lammersfeld; Pankaj G Vashi; Jessica King; Sadie L Dahlk; James F Grutsch; Christopher G Lis
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2008-08-27       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.