Literature DB >> 12402305

Genetic imbalances revealed by comparative genomic hybridization in osteosarcomas.

Toshifumi Ozaki1, Karl-Ludwig Schaefer, Daniel Wai, Horst Buerger, Silke Flege, Norbert Lindner, Matthias Kevric, Raihanatou Diallo, Agnes Bankfalvi, Christian Brinkschmidt, Heribert Juergens, Winfried Winkelmann, Barbara Dockhorn-Dworniczak, Stefan S Bielack, Christopher Poremba.   

Abstract

Osteosarcomas are the most frequent bone sarcomas. The molecular chromosomal aberrations in osteosarcomas were analyzed by comparative genomic hybridization (CGH). We studied 47 frozen tumors (41 primary samples, 6 relapses) in osteosarcoma patients registered in the Cooperative Osteosarcoma Study (COSS) protocol. Genomic imbalances were detected in 40 of 41 primary tumors and 6 of 6 relapsed tumors. Gains were more frequent than losses (ratio of 1.3:1). The median number of changes was 16 and 12 in primary and relapsed osteosarcomas, respectively. The median number of aberrations in primary high-grade osteosarcomas (17.0) was significantly higher than in low- or intermediate-grade osteosarcoma subtypes (3.0) (p = 0.038). The most frequent gains included 8q, 1p21-p31 and 1q21-q24, and the most frequent losses were 10q, 5q and 13q. High-level gains were observed on 8q23-q24, 17p13 and 1q21-q24. A gain of 19p (p < 0.001) or loss of 9p (p = 0.027) was more frequent in poor responders than in good responders. Univariate analysis revealed that patients with primary metastases (p = 0.002), poor histologic responses (p = 0.005), high-level gains of 19p (p = 0.012) or losses of 13q14 (p = 0.042) had significantly lower event-free survival (EFS), whereas patients with a loss of 5q (p = 0.007) or a loss of 10q21-22 (p = 0.017) had significantly higher EFS than patients without these aberrations. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that primary metastasis, loss of 13q14 and loss of 5q were independent prognostic factors. The findings of our study seem to be useful for evaluating the prognosis of patients and may finally lead to treatment strategies based on genetic background of osteosarcoma. Copyright 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12402305     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.10709

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  19 in total

Review 1.  Chromosome 6p amplification and cancer progression.

Authors:  Gda C Santos; M Zielenska; M Prasad; J A Squire
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2006-06-21       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Detection of Somatic Structural Variants Enables Quantification and Characterization of Circulating Tumor DNA in Children With Solid Tumors.

Authors:  Kelly Klega; Alma Imamovic-Tuco; Gavin Ha; Andrea N Clapp; Stephanie Meyer; Abigail Ward; Catherine Clinton; Anwesha Nag; Eliezer Van Allen; Elizabeth Mullen; Steven G DuBois; Katherine Janeway; Matthew Meyerson; Aaron R Thorner; Brian D Crompton
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2018-07-05

3.  Biomarkers in Osteosarcoma.

Authors:  Colin Kong; Marc F Hansen
Journal:  Expert Opin Med Diagn       Date:  2009-01-01

4.  Predictive properties of DNA methylation patterns in primary tumor samples for osteosarcoma relapse status.

Authors:  Jeremy M Rosenblum; N Ari Wijetunga; Melissa J Fazzari; Mark Krailo; Donald A Barkauskas; Richard Gorlick; John M Greally
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 4.528

Review 5.  F-box only protein 9 and its role in cancer.

Authors:  Shujaat Hussain; Jianshu Dong; Xinli Ma; Jian Li; Shen Chen; Agboybor Clement; Hongmin Liu
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 2.316

6.  DNA copy number changes in human malignant fibrous histiocytomas by array comparative genomic hybridisation.

Authors:  Stine H Kresse; Hege O Ohnstad; Bodil Bjerkehagen; Ola Myklebost; Leonardo A Meza-Zepeda
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-11-09       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Using Liquid Biopsy in the Treatment of Patient with OS.

Authors:  David S Shulman; Brian D Crompton
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 2.622

8.  CDH4 is a novel determinant of osteosarcoma tumorigenesis and metastasis.

Authors:  Qinglian Tang; Jinchang Lu; Changye Zou; Yang Shao; Yan Chen; Swami Narala; Hui Fang; Huaiyuan Xu; Jin Wang; Jingnan Shen; Rama Khokha
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 9.867

Review 9.  Osteosarcoma Genetics and Epigenetics: Emerging Biology and Candidate Therapies.

Authors:  James J Morrow; Chand Khanna
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncog       Date:  2015

10.  Influence of genetic background on tumor karyotypes: evidence for breed-associated cytogenetic aberrations in canine appendicular osteosarcoma.

Authors:  Jaime F Modiano; Matthew Breen; Rachael Thomas; Huixia J Wang; Pei-Chien Tsai; Cordelia F Langford; Susan P Fosmire; Cristan M Jubala; David M Getzy; Gary R Cutter
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 5.239

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.