Literature DB >> 12401914

Comparative study of iliac bone graft and carbon cage with local bone graft in posterior lumbar interbody fusion.

Yasuhisa Arai1, Masaki Takahashi, Hisashi Kurosawa, Katsuo Shitoto.   

Abstract

We performed a comparative study of iliac bone graft (the iliac bone group) and carbon cage with local bone graft (the cage group) in PLIF to evaluate the clinical results of both methods. We examined both groups about the operating time, the estimated blood loss, the operative results using the score rating system of Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA score), and the presence of bone union on radiography. The operating time and the estimated blood loss of the cage group were statistically less than those of the iliac bone group. There were no significant differences between both groups about the operative results. The radiographic evaluation on bone union showed that half of the iliac bone group had collapsed union, but all cases of the cage group revealed union without collapse.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12401914     DOI: 10.1177/230949900201000102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong)        ISSN: 1022-5536            Impact factor:   1.118


  7 in total

1.  The influence of cage positioning and cage type on cage migration and fusion rates in patients with monosegmental posterior lumbar interbody fusion and posterior fixation.

Authors:  Alexander Abbushi; Mario Cabraja; Ulrich-Wilhelm Thomale; Christian Woiciechowsky; Stefan Nikolaus Kroppenstedt
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-05-28       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion in adult spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Ching-Hsiao Yu; Chen-Ti Wang; Po-Quang Chen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-10-10       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Biomechanical evaluation of three surgical scenarios of posterior lumbar interbody fusion by finite element analysis.

Authors:  Zhitao Xiao; Liya Wang; He Gong; Dong Zhu
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 2.819

4.  Minimal invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Arvind G Kulkarni; Hussain Bohra; Abhilash Dhruv; Abhishek Sarraf; Anupreet Bassi; Vishwanath M Patil
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.251

5.  Radiographic anatomy and clinical significance of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal oblique fixation from posterior corner in lumbar spine.

Authors:  Feifei Chen; Xiaoyang Liu; Jianmin Sun; Jun Xin; Cheng Su; Guodong Wang; Xingang Cui
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-11

6.  Lumbar Decompression Versus Spinal Fusion in a Private Outpatient Setting: A Retrospective Study with Three Years of Follow-up.

Authors:  Isadora Orlando de Oliveira; Mario Lenza; Eliane Antonioli; Mario Ferretti
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2021-09-11

7.  Comparison of Clinical and Radiological Results of Posterolateral Fusion and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of L4 Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Shugo Kuraishi; Jun Takahashi; Keijiro Mukaiyama; Masayuki Shimizu; Shota Ikegami; Toshimasa Futatsugi; Hiroki Hirabayashi; Nobuhide Ogihara; Hiroyuki Hashidate; Yutaka Tateiwa; Hisatoshi Kinoshita; Hiroyuki Kato
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2016-02-16
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.