Literature DB >> 12401738

The impact of planned care and a diabetes electronic management system on community-based diabetes care: the Mayo Health System Diabetes Translation Project.

Victor M Montori1, Sean F Dinneen, Colum A Gorman, Bruce R Zimmerman, Robert A Rizza, Susan S Bjornsen, Erin M Green, Sandra C Bryant, Steven A Smith.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The Mayo Health System Diabetes Translation Project sought to assess models of community-based diabetes care and use of a diabetes electronic management system (DEMS). Planned care is a redesigned model of chronic disease care that involves guideline implementation, support of self-management, and use of clinical information systems. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We studied adult diabetic patients attending three primary care practice sites in Wisconsin and Minnesota. We implemented planned care at all sites and DEMS in the practice of 16 primary care providers. We assessed quality of diabetes care using standard indicators for 200 patients randomly selected from each site at baseline and at 24 months of implementation. We used multivariable analyses to estimate the association between planned care and DEMS and each quality indicator.
RESULTS: Planned care was associated with improvements in measurement of HbA(1c) (odds ratio 7.0 [95% CI 4.2-11.6]), HDL cholesterol (5.6 [4.1-7.5]), and microalbuminuria (5.3 [3.5-8.0]), as well as the provision of tobacco advice (6.9 [4.7-10.1]), among other performance measures. DEMS use was associated with improvements in all indicators, including microalbuminuria (3.2 [1.9-5.2]), retinal examination (2.4 [1.5-3.9]), foot examinations (2.3 [1.2-4.4]), and self-management support (2.6 [1.7-3.8]). Although planned care was associated with improvements in metabolic control, we observed no additional metabolic benefit when providers used DEMS.
CONCLUSIONS: Planned care was associated with improved performance and metabolic outcomes in primary care. DEMS use augmented the impact of planned care on performance outcomes but not on metabolic outcomes. Optimal identification of the best translation of evidence to diabetes practice will require longer follow-up or new care-delivery models.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12401738     DOI: 10.2337/diacare.25.11.1952

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Care        ISSN: 0149-5992            Impact factor:   19.112


  51 in total

Review 1.  Provider and systems factors in diabetes quality of care.

Authors:  Kimia Ghaznavi; Shaista Malik
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 2.  A systematic review of interactive computer-assisted technology in diabetes care. Interactive information technology in diabetes care.

Authors:  Chandra L Jackson; Shari Bolen; Frederick L Brancati; Marian L Batts-Turner; Tiffany L Gary
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-12-22       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Commentary--improving diabetes care by combating clinical inertia.

Authors:  Patrick J O'Connor
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Assessing the implementation of the chronic care model in quality improvement collaboratives.

Authors:  Marjorie L Pearson; Shinyi Wu; Judith Schaefer; Amy E Bonomi; Stephen M Shortell; Peter J Mendel; Jill A Marsteller; Thomas A Louis; Mayde Rosen; Emmett B Keeler
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Care quality and implementation of the chronic care model: a quantitative study.

Authors:  Leif I Solberg; A Lauren Crain; Joann M Sperl-Hillen; Mary C Hroscikoski; Karen I Engebretson; Patrick J O'Connor
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.166

6.  Crossing the evidence chasm: building evidence bridges from process changes to clinical outcomes.

Authors:  David C Kendrick; Davis Bu; Eric Pan; Blackford Middleton
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2007-02-28       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  A shared treatment decision-making approach between patients with chronic conditions and their clinicians: the case of diabetes.

Authors:  Victor M Montori; Amiram Gafni; Cathy Charles
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.377

8.  Diabetic Retinopathy: Focus on Minority Populations.

Authors:  Arpine Barsegian; Boleslav Kotlyar; Justin Lee; Moro O Salifu; Samy I McFarlane
Journal:  Int J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2017-11-11

9.  Improving diabetes management: structured clinic program for Canadian primary care.

Authors:  Daren Lin; Shirley Hale; Erle Kirby
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.275

10.  Current status and future prospects for electronic point-of-care clinical decision support in diabetes care.

Authors:  Patrick J O'Connor; Jay R Desai; John C Butler; Elyse O Kharbanda; JoAnn M Sperl-Hillen
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.810

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.