Literature DB >> 12401624

A randomized, double-blinded comparison of thoracic epidural ropivacaine, ropivacaine/fentanyl, or bupivacaine/fentanyl for postthoracotomy analgesia.

Antonio Macias1, Pablo Monedero, María Adame, Wenceslao Torre, Isabel Fidalgo, Francisco Hidalgo.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Epidural ropivacaine has not been compared with bupivacaine for postthoracotomy analgesia. Eighty patients undergoing elective lung surgery were randomized in a double-blinded manner to receive one of three solutions for high thoracic epidural analgesia. A continuous epidural infusion of 0.1 mL. kg(-1). h(-1) of either 0.2% ropivacaine, 0.15% ropivacaine/fentanyl 5 micro g/mL, or 0.1% bupivacaine/fentanyl 5 micro g/mL was started at admission to the intensive care unit. We assessed pain scores (rest and spirometry), IV morphine consumption, spirometry, hand grip strength, PaCO(2), heart rate, blood pressure, respiratory rate, and side effects (sedation, nausea, vomiting, and pruritus) for 48 h. Thoracic epidural ropivacaine/fentanyl provided adequate pain relief similar to bupivacaine/fentanyl during the first 2 postoperative days after posterolateral thoracotomy. The use of plain 0.2% ropivacaine was associated with worse pain control during spirometry, larger consumption of IV morphine, and increased incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Morphine requirements were larger in the ropivacaine group, with no differences between bupivacaine/fentanyl and ropivacaine/fentanyl groups. Patients in the ropivacaine group experienced more pain and performed worse in spirometry than patients who received epidural fentanyl. There was no significant difference in motor block. We conclude that epidural ropivacaine/fentanyl offers no clinical advantage compared with bupivacaine/fentanyl for postthoracotomy analgesia. IMPLICATIONS: Thoracic epidural ropivacaine/fentanyl provided adequate pain relief and similar analgesia to bupivacaine/fentanyl during the first 2 postoperative days after posterolateral thoracotomy. Plain 0.2% ropivacaine was associated with worse pain control and an increased incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting. We conclude that epidural ropivacaine/fentanyl offers no clinical advantage compared with bupivacaine/fentanyl for postthoracotomy analgesia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12401624     DOI: 10.1097/00000539-200211000-00046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  3 in total

1.  Ultrasound-guided continuous thoracic paravertebral block provides comparable analgesia and fewer episodes of hypotension than continuous epidural block after lung surgery.

Authors:  Hanae Okajima; Osamu Tanaka; Masahiro Ushio; Yasuko Higuchi; Yukiko Nagai; Katsuhiro Iijima; Yoshio Horikawa; Kazuko Ijichi
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  Epidural ropivacaine infusion for the treatment of pain following axillary muscle-sparing thoracotomy: a dose-evaluation study.

Authors:  Tetsuya Sakai; Shiro Tomiyasu; Koji Sumikawa
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 2.078

3.  Continuous erector spinae plane block versus thoracic epidural analgesia in video-assisted thoracic surgery: a study protocol for a prospective randomized open label non-inferiority trial.

Authors:  R J C van den Broek; J S H A Koopman; J M C Postema; N J Verberkmoes; K J Chin; R A Bouwman; B J B Versyck
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 2.279

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.