Literature DB >> 12401606

Small-dose intrathecal lidocaine versus ropivacaine for anorectal surgery in an ambulatory setting.

Chester C Buckenmaier1, Karen C Nielsen, Ricardo Pietrobon, Stephen M Klein, Aliki H Martin, Roy A Greengrass, Susan M Steele.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Spinal anesthesia with the local anesthetic lidocaine has come under scrutiny because it is associated with transient neurologic symptoms (TNS). We designed this study to prospectively compare the efficacy of ropivacaine as an alternative to lidocaine in patients undergoing elective outpatient anorectal procedures. Seventy-two patients were randomized to receive either hyperbaric lidocaine 25 mg with fentanyl 20 microg (n = 37) or hyperbaric ropivacaine 4 mg with fentanyl 20 microg (n = 35). Patients were examined for motor block, sensory block, and block duration. Patients were contacted at 24, 48, 72, and 168 h and questioned about their perceptions of pain after the spinal with specific questions designed to diagnose TNS. There were no patients with TNS in either group. There was no significant difference between the lidocaine and ropivacaine groups in any of the outcomes studied. In conclusion, intrathecal hyperbaric small-dose ropivacaine with fentanyl is an acceptable anesthetic for anorectal surgery. IMPLICATIONS: In this prospective trial, small-dose ropivacaine with fentanyl was as effective as small-dose lidocaine with fentanyl for anorectal procedures in the ambulatory setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12401606     DOI: 10.1097/00000539-200211000-00028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  7 in total

Review 1.  Ropivacaine: a review of its use in regional anaesthesia and acute pain management.

Authors:  Dene Simpson; Monique P Curran; Vicki Oldfield; Gillian M Keating
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  Anaesthetic agents for advanced regional anaesthesia: a North American perspective.

Authors:  Chester C Buckenmaier; Lisa L Bleckner
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 3.  Neuraxial drug administration: a review of treatment options for anaesthesia and analgesia.

Authors:  Stephan A Schug; David Saunders; Irina Kurowski; Michael J Paech
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.749

4.  Do we still need to restrict preoperative fluid administration in ambulatory anorectal surgery under spinal anaesthesia?

Authors:  B C Orbey; Z Alanoglu; A A Yilmaz; B Erkek; Y Ates; M Ayhan Kuzu
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2009-03-14       Impact factor: 3.781

5.  Practicability and patients' subjective experiences of low-dose spinal anaesthesia using hyperbaric bupivacaine for transanal surgery.

Authors:  Marc D Schmittner; Andrea Janke; Christel Weiss; Grietje C Beck; Dieter G Bussen
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-03-13       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Comparison between two different selective spinal anesthesia techniques in ambulatory knee arthroscopy as fast-track anesthesia.

Authors:  Hossam Ibrahim Eldesuky Ali Hassan
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2015 Jan-Apr

7.  Lidocaine vs. Other Local Anesthetics in the Development of Transient Neurologic Symptoms (TNS) Following Spinal Anesthesia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Chang-Hoon Koo; Hyun-Jung Shin; Sung-Hee Han; Jung-Hee Ryu
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 4.241

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.