Literature DB >> 12401247

Effect of air-pollution control on death rates in Dublin, Ireland: an intervention study.

Luke Clancy1, Pat Goodman, Hamish Sinclair, Douglas W Dockery.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Particulate air pollution episodes have been associated with increased daily death. However, there is little direct evidence that diminished particulate air pollution concentrations would lead to reductions in death rates. We assessed the effect of air pollution controls--ie, the ban on coal sales--on particulate air pollution and death rates in Dublin.
METHODS: Concentrations of air pollution and directly-standardised non-trauma, respiratory, and cardiovascular death rates were compared for 72 months before and after the ban of coal sales in Dublin. The effect of the ban on age-standardised death rates was estimated with an interrupted time-series analysis, adjusting for weather, respiratory epidemics, and death rates in the rest of Ireland.
FINDINGS: Average black smoke concentrations in Dublin declined by 35.6 mg/m(3) (70%) after the ban on coal sales. Adjusted non-trauma death rates decreased by 5.7% (95% CI 4-7, p<0.0001), respiratory deaths by 15.5% (12-19, p<0.0001), and cardiovascular deaths by 10.3% (8-13, p<0.0001). Respiratory and cardiovascular standardised death rates fell coincident with the ban on coal sales. About 116 fewer respiratory deaths and 243 fewer cardiovascular deaths were seen per year in Dublin after the ban.
INTERPRETATION: Reductions in respiratory and cardiovascular death rates in Dublin suggest that control of particulate air pollution could substantially diminish daily death. The net benefit of the reduced death rate was greater than predicted from results of previous time-series studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12401247     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11281-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  121 in total

1.  Association between changes in air pollution levels during the Beijing Olympics and biomarkers of inflammation and thrombosis in healthy young adults.

Authors:  David Q Rich; Howard M Kipen; Wei Huang; Guangfa Wang; Yuedan Wang; Ping Zhu; Pamela Ohman-Strickland; Min Hu; Claire Philipp; Scott R Diehl; Shou-En Lu; Jian Tong; Jicheng Gong; Duncan Thomas; Tong Zhu; Junfeng Jim Zhang
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 2.  Why cardiologists should be interested in air pollution.

Authors:  H C Routledge; J G Ayres; J N Townend
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  On influencing population means.

Authors:  Rémy Slama; Valérie Siroux
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 4.822

Review 4.  How Can Urban Policies Improve Air Quality and Help Mitigate Global Climate Change: a Systematic Mapping Review.

Authors:  Anne Dorothée Slovic; Maria Aparecida de Oliveira; João Biehl; Helena Ribeiro
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.671

Review 5.  Accountability studies of air pollution and health effects: lessons learned and recommendations for future natural experiment opportunities.

Authors:  David Q Rich
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 9.621

6.  Apheis: Health impact assessment of long-term exposure to PM(2.5) in 23 European cities.

Authors:  Elena Boldo; Sylvia Medina; Alain LeTertre; Fintan Hurley; Hans-Guido Mücke; Ferrán Ballester; Inmaculada Aguilera; Daniel Eilstein
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2006-07-07       Impact factor: 8.082

7.  Reduction in fine particulate air pollution and mortality: Extended follow-up of the Harvard Six Cities study.

Authors:  Francine Laden; Joel Schwartz; Frank E Speizer; Douglas W Dockery
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2006-01-19       Impact factor: 21.405

8.  Complex causal process diagrams for analyzing the health impacts of policy interventions.

Authors:  Michael Joffe; Jennifer Mindell
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-01-31       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 9.  Nanoparticles: pharmacological and toxicological significance.

Authors:  C Medina; M J Santos-Martinez; A Radomski; O I Corrigan; M W Radomski
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2007-01-22       Impact factor: 8.739

10.  A healthy economy can break your heart.

Authors:  Christopher J Ruhm
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2007-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.