Literature DB >> 12401156

Information about tests for breast cancer: what are we telling people?

Emily Croft1, Alexandra Barratt, Phyllis Butow.   

Abstract

We reviewed publications currently available about breast cancer screening to assess what information was provided about test accuracy and pretest and posttest disease probabilities, as this information is needed by consumers to make informed decisions about whether to undergo testing and to fully understand test results. A rating form was developed and used to assess 54 publications about their reports of breast cancer tests. A description of how the test is done was provided by almost all publications (93%). About half (48%) provided some information about possible adverse effects of the test. Eighteen percent of publications provided some (generally qualitative) information about test accuracy, and none provided quantitative information about the probability of disease given normal and abnormal test results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12401156

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Fam Pract        ISSN: 0094-3509            Impact factor:   0.493


  8 in total

1.  Presentation on websites of possible benefits and harms from screening for breast cancer: cross sectional study.

Authors:  Karsten Juhl Jørgensen; Peter C Gøtzsche
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-01-17

2.  "No respecter of youth": over-representation of young women in Australian television coverage of breast cancer.

Authors:  Ross MacKenzie; Simon Chapman; Simon Holding; Annie Stiven
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  "What does this mean?" How Web-based consumer health information fails to support information seeking in the pursuit of informed consent for screening test decisions.

Authors:  Jacquelyn Burkell; D Grant Campbell
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2005-07

4.  Overdiagnosis in organised mammography screening in Denmark. A comparative study.

Authors:  Karsten J Jørgensen; Per-Henrik Zahl; Peter C Gøtzsche
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 2.809

5.  Consumer information materials for diagnostic breast tests: women's views on information and their understanding of test results.

Authors:  Heather M Davey; Jacqueline Lim; Phyllis N Butow; Alexandra L Barratt; Nehmat Houssami; Roberta Higginson
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  Using an informed consent in mammography screening: a randomized trial.

Authors:  José M Baena-Cañada; Petra Rosado-Varela; Inmaculada Expósito-Álvarez; Macarena González-Guerrero; Juan Nieto-Vera; Encarnación Benítez-Rodríguez
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 4.452

7.  The role of effective communication to enhance participation in screening mammography: a New Zealand case.

Authors:  Margaret A Brunton
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 8.  Are benefits and harms in mammography screening given equal attention in scientific articles? A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Karsten Juhl Jørgensen; Anders Klahn; Peter C Gøtzsche
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2007-05-30       Impact factor: 8.775

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.