Literature DB >> 12400812

Primary stenting versus MIDCAB: preliminary report-comparision of two methods of revascularization in single left anterior descending coronary artery stenosis.

Marek Cisowski1, Janusz Drzewiecki, Agnieszka Drzewiecka-Gerber, Andrzej Jaklik, Wojciech Kruczak, Michal Szczeklik, Andrzej Bochenek.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous revascularization is a well-accepted method of treatment for a single left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) stenosis. With the introduction of primary stenting, it has become the treatment of choice for a LAD lesion. In the last few years however, the introduction of minimally invasive cardiac surgery, video-assisted left internal thoracic artery (LITA) harvesting, and robotic surgery have raised the question as to whether minimally invasive surgical revascularization would be competitive with percutaneous coronary interventions in cases of single-vessel stenoses.
METHODS: A group of 100 patients with Canadian Cardiovascular Society class II to IV, and angiographically confirmed single critical stenosis of the LAD (type A or B), were treated with direct primary stenting (group 1, n = 50), or with endoscopic atraumatic coronary artery bypass grafting (group 2, n =50).
RESULTS: All patients in a group 1, obtained a very good angiographic and clinical effect. No acute postoperative complications were noted at 1 month of follow-up. However, at 1 month of follow-up, 3 patients (6%) developed restenosis of the LAD, and at 6 months follow-up, 6 patients (12%), developed restenosis of the LAD. In these cases, repeated percutaneous coronary interventions of the target vessel were successfully performed. In group 2, very good operative results were observed. In 1 and 6 months of follow-up, all patients remained asymptomatic. Critical stenosis of the left internal thoracic artery-LAD anastomosis was angiographically documented in 1 case (2%). This patient was successfully treated with balloon angioplasty.
CONCLUSIONS: The study results document the superiority of endoscopic atraumatic coronary artery bypass grafting over direct primary stenting in LAD revascularization, along with the slightly higher costs of the surgical procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12400812     DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(02)03971-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  9 in total

Review 1.  Robotic surgery: a current perspective.

Authors:  Anthony R Lanfranco; Andres E Castellanos; Jaydev P Desai; William C Meyers
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Coronary artery bypass graft versus drug-eluting stent for high-risk proximal left anterior descending stenosis.

Authors:  Holger Thiele; Volkmar Falk
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2010-01

Review 3.  Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty with stents versus coronary artery bypass grafting for people with stable angina or acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  A Bakhai; R A Hill; Y Dundar; R Dickson; T Walley
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2005-01-25

Review 4.  Minimally invasive surgery or stenting for left anterior descending artery disease - meta-analysis.

Authors:  Monica Gianoli; Anne R de Jong; Kirolos A Jacob; Hanae F Namba; Niels P van der Kaaij; Pim van der Harst; Willem J L Suyker
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc       Date:  2022-05-10

5.  Overall and Cause-Specific Mortality in Randomized Clinical Trials Comparing Percutaneous Interventions With Coronary Bypass Surgery: A Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mario Gaudino; Irbaz Hameed; Michael E Farkouh; Mohamed Rahouma; Ajita Naik; N Bryce Robinson; Yongle Ruan; Michelle Demetres; Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai; Dominick J Angiolillo; Emilia Bagiella; Mary E Charlson; Umberto Benedetto; Marc Ruel; David P Taggart; Leonard N Girardi; Deepak L Bhatt; Stephen E Fremes
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 21.873

6.  Difference in spontaneous myocardial infarction and mortality in percutaneous versus surgical revascularization trials: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mario Gaudino; Antonino Di Franco; Cristiano Spadaccio; Mohamed Rahouma; N Bryce Robinson; Michelle Demetres; Stephen Fremes; Torsten Doenst
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 5.209

7.  Stratification of coronary artery disease patients for revascularization procedure based on estimating adverse effects.

Authors:  Sebastian Pölsterl; Maneesh Singh; Amin Katouzian; Nassir Navab; Adnan Kastrati; Lance Ladic; Ali Kamen
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2015-02-14       Impact factor: 2.796

Review 8.  Minimally invasive direct coronary bypass compared with percutaneous coronary intervention for left anterior descending artery disease: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiao-Wen Wang; Can Qu; Chun Huang; Xiao-Yong Xiang; Zhi-Qian Lu
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 1.637

Review 9.  Minimally invasive and robotic coronary artery bypass grafting-a 25-year review.

Authors:  Johannes Bonatti; Stephanie Wallner; Ingo Crailsheim; Martin Grabenwöger; Bernhard Winkler
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 2.895

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.