Literature DB >> 12399838

Health-related quality of life after laparoscopic and open nephrectomy.

K T Pace1, S J Dyer, R J Stewart, R J Honey, E C Poulin, C M Schlachta, J Mamazza.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Postoperative recovery often is assessed with parameters (pain and return to work) susceptible to bias. This study sought objectively to compare postoperative health-related quality of life (HRQL) after laparoscopic and open nephrectomy with the Postoperative Recovery (PRS) (a validated questionnaire designed to assess pain), activities of daily living (ADL), and HRQL in postoperative patients.
METHODS: Patients undergoing contemporaneous laparoscopic and open nephrectomy received the PRS pre- and postoperatively. The results were analyzed with analysis of covariance (ANCOV) and survival analysis.
RESULTS: The 33 open nephrectomy and 38 laparoscopic patients in this study were comparable in age, gender, body mass index (BMI) and employment. Laparoscopic operative time was longer (p = 0.015), and the hospital stay was shorter (p<0.001). Laparoscopic patients had higher HRQL scores from postoperative days 3 to 365 (p<0.001), and they returned to preoperative HRQL faster (p<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: An objective HRQL instrument confirms that laparoscopic nephrectomy patients recover faster and with a higher HRQL than open surgery patients. The PRS can be modified for use after other abdominal procedures, and may prove useful for comparisons of other minimally invasive surgical techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12399838     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-002-8902-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  10 in total

1.  Impact of laparoscopic nephrectomy on donor preoperative decision-making and postoperative quality of life and psychosocial outcomes.

Authors:  Christoph Troppmann; William K Johnston; Jonathan L Pierce; John P McVicar; Richard V Perez
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2006-04-25       Impact factor: 3.714

2.  Comparison of laparoscopic and open pyeloplasty in 100 patients with pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction.

Authors:  R C Calvert; M M Morsy; B Zelhof; M Rhodes; N A Burgess
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open donor nephrectomy for kidney transplantation: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lingping Wang; Li Zhu; Xubiao Xie; Haifeng Wang; Hui Yin; Chunhua Fang; Helong Dai
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 4.060

4.  The history of renal transplantation in Canada: A urologic perspective.

Authors:  Max Alexander Levine; Joseph L Chin; Andrew Rasmussen; Alp Sener; Patrick P Luke
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 5.  Comparative outcomes of minimally invasive surgery for posterior lumbar fusion: a systematic review.

Authors:  Christina L Goldstein; Kevin Macwan; Kala Sundararajan; Y Raja Rampersaud
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 6.  Evaluation of quality of life after laparoscopic surgery: evidence-based guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery.

Authors:  D Korolija; S Sauerland; S Wood-Dauphinée; C C Abbou; E Eypasch; M García Caballero; M A Lumsden; B Millat; J R T Monson; G Nilsson; R Pointner; W Schwenk; A Shamiyeh; A Szold; E Targarona; B Ure; E Neugebauer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-04-27       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Detailed evaluation of functional recovery following laparoscopic or open surgery for colorectal cancer within an enhanced recovery programme.

Authors:  P M King; J M Blazeby; P Ewings; R H Kennedy
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-05-09       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Laparoscopic nephrectomy for autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease.

Authors:  Y Bendavid; H Moloo; L Klein; S Burpee; C M Schlachta; E C Poulin; J Mamazza
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-03-19       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Laparoscopic nephrectomy in patients undergoing hemodialysis treatment.

Authors:  Oner Sanli; Tzevat Tefik; Mazhar Ortac; Meltem Karadeniz; Tayfun Oktar; Ismet Nane; Murat Tunc
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2010 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

10.  Patient-reported outcomes in a phase III, randomized study of sunitinib versus interferon-{alpha} as first-line systemic therapy for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma in a European population.

Authors:  D Castellano; X Garcia del Muro; J L Pérez-Gracia; J L González-Larriba; M V Abrio; M A Ruiz; A Pardo; C Guzmán; S Díaz Cerezo; E Grande
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 32.976

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.