Literature DB >> 12399832

Rapid flow carbon dioxide laparoscopy disperses cancer cells into the peritoneal cavity but not the port sites in a new rat model.

K S Zayyan1, J S Christie-Brown, S Van Noorden, C-Y Yiu, D P Sellu, R T Mathie.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The role of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the pathogenesis of tumor recurrence after laparoscopy remains controversial. Using a new rat model, we studied the effect of different CO2 flow rates on the dispersal of free cancer cells.
METHODS: A novel model of desufflation without trocar was developed, and 55 Fischer rats were randomized into three flow groups: group A (rapid, 0.67 l/min; n = 20), group B (slow, 0.44 l/min; n = 20), and group C (gasless, n = 15). We vented CO2 via a portless surgical valve that filtered cells. After the abdominal wall had been suspended to create space, half of the animals in each group (nonrecovery) received 7.5 x 10(6) immunolabeled rat colon cancer cells (RCC2) intraperitoneally, whereas the other half (recovery) received 7.5 x l0(6) viable RCC2 before insufflation or gasless laparoscopy. Nonrecovery animals were killed after 20 l of insufflation. Parietal peritoneal and port-site specimens were examined for RCC2 by fluorescence microscopy (FM) and flow cytometry (FC). The recovery animals were killed at 4 weeks for evidence of wound recurrence.
RESULTS: Nine of 10 nonrecovery animals in A had RCC2 on FM or FC, as compared with 2 animals in each of the nonrecovery groups B and C (p = 0.018, Fisher's exact test). Two of the nine animals in group A also had RCC2 in their portless valves. Two recovery (A) animals developed wound recurrence as compared with none in the other groups (p = 0.315).
CONCLUSION: In this model, rapid CO2 flow dispersed free cancer cells into the peritoneal cavity, but not into the port sites, thus supporting a role for CO2 in the intraperitoneal dispersal of free cancer cells, but not in wound recurrence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12399832     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-002-8824-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  4 in total

1.  Comparison of short, long-term surgical outcomes and mid-term health-related quality of life after laparoscopic and open resection for colorectal cancer: a case-matched control study.

Authors:  Shoichi Fujii; Mitsuyoshi Ota; Yasushi Ichikawa; Shigeru Yamagishi; Kazuteru Watanabe; Kenji Tatsumi; Jun Watanabe; Hirokazu Suwa; Takashi Oshima; Chikara Kunisaki; Shigeo Ohki; Itaru Endo; Hiroshi Shimada
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Current Evidence for Minimally Invasive Surgery During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Risk Mitigation Strategies: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Sami A Chadi; Keegan Guidolin; Antonio Caycedo-Marulanda; Abdu Sharkawy; Antonino Spinelli; Fayez A Quereshy; Allan Okrainec
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Inhibition of peritoneal dissemination of colon cancer by hyperthermic CO2 insufflation: A novel approach to prevent intraperitoneal tumor spread.

Authors:  Yuanfei Peng; Hua Yang; Qing Ye; Houming Zhou; Minhua Zheng; Yinghong Shi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Does carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum enhance wound metastases following laparoscopic abdominal tumor surgery? A meta-analysis of 20 randomized control studies.

Authors:  Xianwei Mo; Yang Yang; Hao Lai; Jun Xiao; Ke He; Jiansi Chen; Yuan Lin
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-04-18
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.