| Literature DB >> 12399014 |
Mark Shelhamer1, Richard Clendaniel.
Abstract
Saccadic eye movements can be adapted in a context-specific manner such that their gain can be made to depend on the state of a prevailing context cue. We asked whether context cues are more effective if their nature is primarily sensory, motor, or a combination of sensory and motor. Subjects underwent context-specific adaptation using one of three different context cues: a pure sensory context (head roll-tilt right or left); a pure motor context (changes in saccade direction); or a combined sensory-motor context (head roll-tilt and changes in saccade direction). We observed context-specific adaptation in each condition; the greatest degree of context-specificity occurred in paradigms that used the motor cue, alone or in conjunction with the sensory cue. Copyright 2002 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd.Entities:
Keywords: NASA Discipline Neuroscience; Non-NASA Center
Mesh:
Year: 2002 PMID: 12399014 DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3940(02)00951-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neurosci Lett ISSN: 0304-3940 Impact factor: 3.046