Literature DB >> 12398119

Implementation of the British Thoracic Society recommendations for organising the care of patients with lung cancer: the surgeon's perspective.

J Lee1, A Marchbank, P Goldstraw.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The British Thoracic Society (BTS) recognises that it is of paramount importance to ensure that all patients with a working diagnosis of lung cancer have access to first class care [The Lung Cancer Working Party of the British Thoracic Society Standards of Care Committee. BTS recommendations to respiratory physicians for organising the care of patients with lung cancer. Thorax 1998; 53 (Suppl 1): S1-81.
METHODS: A retrospective audit of the time involved in the management of patients with lung cancer referred for consideration of surgery at the Royal Brompton Hospital was carried out. Our performance was compared with the BTS recommendations.
RESULTS: The notes from 194 patients were analysed, accounting for 93.7% of patients referred with lung cancer in a 1-year period. A total of 90 patients fulfilled the criteria for analysis as they had potentially resectable disease at referral; 59 (65.5%) underwent thoracotomy, and 31 (34.5%) were considered inoperable. The median interval between the onset of symptoms and their first chest radiograph was 39 days, and between the onset of symptoms and referral to a surgeon by a chest physician was 112 days. The median interval between referral by a respiratory physician and surgical out-patient attendance was 14 days, and between referral by a respiratory physician and the surgical procedure was 32.5 days. The median length of time from surgical out-patient attendance to the surgical procedure was 17 days. There was no association between the interval between the onset of symptoms and the surgical procedure with advanced tumour stage at surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: There are a number of sources of delay in the referral process for a patient with potentially resectable lung cancer. Most patients referred to our unit were treated within the time scale recommended by the BTS. Our survey has shown that there are cumulative delays in the overall investigation and management of lung cancer patients, which are not covered by the BTS guidelines, and which result in unacceptable delays for most patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12398119      PMCID: PMC2504152          DOI: 10.1308/003588402760452385

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  2 in total

1.  Delays in the diagnosis and surgical treatment of lung cancer.

Authors:  J S Billing; F C Wells
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 9.139

2.  Reducing waiting times in lung cancer.

Authors:  P C Deegan; L Heath; J Brunskill; W J Kinnear; S A Morgan; I D Johnston
Journal:  J R Coll Physicians Lond       Date:  1998 Jul-Aug
  2 in total
  7 in total

1.  Effect of delays on survival in patients with lung cancer.

Authors:  Francisco Javier González-Barcala; José María García-Prim; José Manuel Alvarez-Dobaño; Milagros Moldes-Rodríguez; María Teresa García-Sanz; Antonio Pose-Reino; Luis Valdés-Cuadrado
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.405

2.  Lung cancer care trajectory at a Canadian centre: an evaluation of how wait times affect clinical outcomes.

Authors:  G Kasymjanova; D Small; V Cohen; R T Jagoe; G Batist; W Sateren; P Ernst; C Pepe; L Sakr; J Agulnik
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 3.  Defining timeliness in care for patients with lung cancer: a scoping review.

Authors:  Adnan Ansar; Virginia Lewis; Christine Faye McDonald; Chaojie Liu; Muhammad Aziz Rahman
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Delays to surgery in non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Moishe Liberman; Dan Liberman; John S Sampalis; David S Mulder
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.089

5.  Cancer patient assessment and reports of excellence: reliability and validity of advanced cancer patient perceptions of the quality of care.

Authors:  Joan M Teno; Julie C Lima; Kathleen Doyle Lyons
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-03-02       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Managing patient pathways to achieve lung cancer waiting time targets: mixed methods study.

Authors:  Hugh Ip; Tarik Amer; Michael Dangoor; Affan Zamir; Darryl Gibbings-Isaac; Ranjeev Kochhar; Timothy Heymann
Journal:  JRSM Short Rep       Date:  2012-10-15

7.  UK waiting time targets in lung cancer treatment: are they achievable? Results of a prospective tracking study.

Authors:  Mohan P Devbhandari; Sing Yang Soon; Pauline Quennell; Philip Barber; Piotr Krysiak; Rajesh Shah; Mark T Jones
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2007-01-12       Impact factor: 1.637

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.