BACKGROUND/AIMS: To examine the effectiveness of therapeutic percutaneous drainage of peripancreatic fluid in the treatment of acute necrotizing pancreatitis. METHODOLOGY: Twenty-eight patients treated for serious acute necrotizing pancreatitis (19 male, 9 female; average age 47.3 years) took part in the study. The cause of acute necrotizing pancreatitis was alcohol abuse in 20 of the cases, gallstone disease in 7 cases, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in 2 cases, trauma in one case, and 4 of the cases had unknown cause. In all cases preventative antibiotics were given as part of intensive therapy, early nasojejunal nutrition was used, and we endeavored to avoid surgery or to delay it depending on the case. The acute peripancreatic fluid was drained percutaneously. In total, percutaneous drainage was used in 12 patients. RESULTS: Of the 28 patients, only 3 patients recovered solely with conservative therapy, without drainage. Three patients recovered using only percutaneous drainage without surgery. In 9 patients surgery was necessary after percutaneous drainage was performed. In the remaining 13 patients, only surgical treatment was used, without percutaneous drainage. In total 20 reoperations were done in 10 patients. Of the 12 patients treated with percutaneous drainage, one patient died. The total mortality was 14.3%. CONCLUSIONS: In certain cases the percutaneous drainage of the acute peripancreatic fluid that collects in acute necrotizing pancreatitis is sufficient for the total recovery of acute necrotizing pancreatitis, in other cases can be used to postpone surgery.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: To examine the effectiveness of therapeutic percutaneous drainage of peripancreatic fluid in the treatment of acute necrotizing pancreatitis. METHODOLOGY: Twenty-eight patients treated for serious acute necrotizing pancreatitis (19 male, 9 female; average age 47.3 years) took part in the study. The cause of acute necrotizing pancreatitis was alcohol abuse in 20 of the cases, gallstone disease in 7 cases, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in 2 cases, trauma in one case, and 4 of the cases had unknown cause. In all cases preventative antibiotics were given as part of intensive therapy, early nasojejunal nutrition was used, and we endeavored to avoid surgery or to delay it depending on the case. The acute peripancreatic fluid was drained percutaneously. In total, percutaneous drainage was used in 12 patients. RESULTS: Of the 28 patients, only 3 patients recovered solely with conservative therapy, without drainage. Three patients recovered using only percutaneous drainage without surgery. In 9 patients surgery was necessary after percutaneous drainage was performed. In the remaining 13 patients, only surgical treatment was used, without percutaneous drainage. In total 20 reoperations were done in 10 patients. Of the 12 patients treated with percutaneous drainage, one patient died. The total mortality was 14.3%. CONCLUSIONS: In certain cases the percutaneous drainage of the acute peripancreatic fluid that collects in acute necrotizing pancreatitis is sufficient for the total recovery of acute necrotizing pancreatitis, in other cases can be used to postpone surgery.
Authors: Naoki Takahashi; Georgios I Papachristou; Grant D Schmit; Prabhleen Chahal; Andrew J LeRoy; Michael G Sarr; Santhi Swaroop Vege; Jayawant N Mandrekar; Todd H Baron Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2008-06-18 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: T Bruennler; J Langgartner; S Lang; N Zorger; T Herold; B Salzberger; S Feuerbach; J Schoelmerich; O W Hamer Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2008-03-21 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: J Ruben Rodriguez; A Oswaldo Razo; Javier Targarona; Sarah P Thayer; David W Rattner; Andrew L Warshaw; Carlos Fernández-del Castillo Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2008-02 Impact factor: 12.969