Literature DB >> 12397279

Accuracy of EUS for detection of intraductal papillary mucinous tumor of the pancreas.

Guruprasad P Aithal1, Robert Y m Chen, John T Cunningham, Valerie Durkalski, Eun Y Kim, Rig S Patel, Michael B Wallace, Robert H Hawes, Brenda J Hoffman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with intraductal papillary mucinous tumors of the pancreas (IPMT) present with symptoms similar to those of chronic pancreatitis. This study assessed the accuracy of EUS for detection of IPMT and identified features that discriminate IPMT from chronic pancreatitis.
METHODS: EUS accuracy for detecting IPMT was determined with characteristic findings by endoscopic retrograde pancreatography as the reference standard. To determine EUS features characteristic of IPMT, EUS images from patients with IPMT were compared with those from patients (similar age, gender) with chronic pancreatitis.
RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients (23 men, 15 women; age range 40-90 years) with IPMT were identified between 1994 and 2001. For EUS, the sensitivity was 86%, specificity 99%, positive predictive value 78%, and negative predictive value 99% for detection of IPMT. When compared with patients with chronic pancreatitis, the EUS features of dilation of pancreatic duct (89% vs. 42%, p < 0.0001), cysts (45% vs. 11%, p = 0.002), and pancreatic atrophy (32% vs. 3%, p = 0.002) were more common, whereas parenchymal features of chronic pancreatitis were less common with IPMT (21% vs. 97%, p < 0.0001). By multivariate analysis, the presence of no more than one parenchymal feature of chronic pancreatitis suggested the diagnosis of IPMT (odds ratio 43.84; 95% CI [4.13, 465.74]).
CONCLUSIONS: EUS may be useful in the initial evaluation of patients suspected to have IPMT. Paucity of parenchymal features of chronic pancreatitis is important in differentiating IPMT from other causes of chronic pancreatitis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12397279     DOI: 10.1067/mge.2002.128542

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  9 in total

Review 1.  Hereditary pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Shilpa Grover; Sapna Syngal
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 2.  Diagnostic approach to patients with acute idiopathic and recurrent pancreatitis, what should be done?

Authors:  Mohammad Al-Haddad; Michael B Wallace
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  The role of cytology in the preoperative assessment and management of patients with pancreaticobiliary tract neoplasms.

Authors:  Judy C Pang; Rebecca M Minter; Richard S Kwon; Diane M Simeone; Michael H Roh
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopic approaches to intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm.

Authors:  Brian G Turner; William R Brugge
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-10-27

5.  Endoscopic ultrasonography and idiopathic acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  Juan J Vila
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2010-04-16

Review 6.  Imaging modalities for characterising focal pancreatic lesions.

Authors:  Lawrence Mj Best; Vishal Rawji; Stephen P Pereira; Brian R Davidson; Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-04-17

Review 7.  Diagnosis and management of relapsing pancreatitis associated with cystic neoplasms of the pancreas.

Authors:  William-R Brugge
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas (IPMN): clinico-pathological correlations and surgical indications.

Authors:  Gian Luca Baiocchi; Nazario Portolani; Guido Missale; Carla Baronchelli; Federico Gheza; Massimiliano Cantù; Luigi Grazioli; Stefano M Giulini
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 2.754

9.  Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas and European guidelines: importance of the surgery type in the decision-making process.

Authors:  Etienne Buscail; Thomas Cauvin; Benjamin Fernandez; Camille Buscail; Marion Marty; Bruno Lapuyade; Clément Subtil; Jean-Philippe Adam; Véronique Vendrely; Sandrine Dabernat; Christophe Laurent; Laurence Chiche
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 2.102

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.