BACKGROUND: The increasing utilization of human UC blood (UCB) in transplantation has drawn attention to the need for rationalization of selection, collection, processing, testing, banking and release of UCB. However, the issue of maternal blood contamination has not been well addressed. There are concerns that maternal T cells might elicit GvHD post-UCB transplant. METHODS: Maternal T cells in 58 male UCB allografts were enumerated using fluorescent in situ hybridization and flow cytometry. Obstetric factors, preceding labor, multi-parity and gestational age, were also analyzed. RESULTS: Levels of maternal cells of 0.75-5.25% were found in 15.5% (9/58) UCB. There was no association of maternal-cell contamination with preceding labor [25% (2/8) with previous delivery versus 35.4% (17/48) first born, P = 0.702], nor any correlation with multi-parity [37.5% (3/8) para > or = 3 versus 16.7% (8/48) para < 3, P = 0.181]. Gestation age of newborns also exhibited no association with maternal-cell contamination (39.47 weeks in newborn UCB with maternal cells, versus 39.58 weeks without: P = 0.674). The extrapolated maternal T cells/kg in nine UCB transplants were 1.05 x 10(5) +/- 1.12 x 10(5) (3.40 x 10(4) - 3.18 x 10(5)). DISCUSSION: In relation to the arbitrary threshold of 1 x 10(5) T cells/kg in HLA-mismatched transplants utilizing T-cell depleted BM, 22.2% (2/9) of UCB transplants having maternal-cell contamination might be at risk of GvHD. Data support the need for testing for maternal blood in UCB, and evaluating the clinical relevance of GvHD in patients post-UCB transplant. The establishment of guidelines and standards for release of such UCB collections would be advisable in evidence-based UCB transplantation.
BACKGROUND: The increasing utilization of human UC blood (UCB) in transplantation has drawn attention to the need for rationalization of selection, collection, processing, testing, banking and release of UCB. However, the issue of maternal blood contamination has not been well addressed. There are concerns that maternal T cells might elicit GvHD post-UCB transplant. METHODS: Maternal T cells in 58 male UCB allografts were enumerated using fluorescent in situ hybridization and flow cytometry. Obstetric factors, preceding labor, multi-parity and gestational age, were also analyzed. RESULTS: Levels of maternal cells of 0.75-5.25% were found in 15.5% (9/58) UCB. There was no association of maternal-cell contamination with preceding labor [25% (2/8) with previous delivery versus 35.4% (17/48) first born, P = 0.702], nor any correlation with multi-parity [37.5% (3/8) para > or = 3 versus 16.7% (8/48) para < 3, P = 0.181]. Gestation age of newborns also exhibited no association with maternal-cell contamination (39.47 weeks in newborn UCB with maternal cells, versus 39.58 weeks without: P = 0.674). The extrapolated maternal T cells/kg in nine UCB transplants were 1.05 x 10(5) +/- 1.12 x 10(5) (3.40 x 10(4) - 3.18 x 10(5)). DISCUSSION: In relation to the arbitrary threshold of 1 x 10(5) T cells/kg in HLA-mismatched transplants utilizing T-cell depleted BM, 22.2% (2/9) of UCB transplants having maternal-cell contamination might be at risk of GvHD. Data support the need for testing for maternal blood in UCB, and evaluating the clinical relevance of GvHD in patients post-UCB transplant. The establishment of guidelines and standards for release of such UCB collections would be advisable in evidence-based UCB transplantation.
Authors: Stacy S Drury; Kyle Esteves; Virginia Hatch; Margaret Woodbury; Sophie Borne; Alys Adamski; Katherine P Theall Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2015-02-11 Impact factor: 4.406