Literature DB >> 12396310

Three methods for studying developmental change: a case of reading skills and self-concept.

Kaisa Aunola1, Esko Leskinen, Tiina Onatsu-Arvilommi, Jari-Erik Nurmi.   

Abstract

AIMS: First, to introduce and compare three statistical methods for investigating development as a cumulative process: a simplex model, latent growth curve analysis, and clustering by cases. Second, to investigate the developmental dynamics of reading skills, and self-concept of reading ability, across the first year of primary school. SAMPLE: One hundred and five (61 boys, 44 girls) 6- to 7-year-old children from four first-grade classes in two primary schools participated in the study.
METHOD: Children were studied three times during their first school year using an identical set of measurements: a Reading Skills Test and the Self-Concept of Ability scale.
RESULTS: A uni-construct 'Matthew' effect was found for the development of self-concept, but not for the reading skills. However, the results showed that there was a multi-construct cumulative cycle between children's reading skills and their self-concept.
CONCLUSIONS: Simultaneous use of variable- and person-oriented methods in developmental research seems to be a valuable approach, which not only provides a proper way to investigate the cumulative developmental cycles but also an option to examine how large a proportion of the sample follows the positive and negative pattern found in variable-oriented analyses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12396310     DOI: 10.1348/000709902320634447

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Educ Psychol        ISSN: 0007-0998


  11 in total

1.  Exploring how nature and nurture affect the development of reading: an analysis of the Florida Twin Project on reading.

Authors:  Sara A Hart; Jessica A R Logan; Brooke Soden-Hensler; Sarah Kershaw; Jeanette Taylor; Christopher Schatschneider
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2013-01-07

2.  Using assessment to individualize early mathematics instruction.

Authors:  Carol McDonald Connor; Michèle M M Mazzocco; Terri Kurz; Elizabeth C Crowe; Elizabeth L Tighe; Taffeta S Wood; Frederick J Morrison
Journal:  J Sch Psychol       Date:  2017-07-13

3.  Kindergarten children's growth trajectories in reading and mathematics: who falls increasingly behind?

Authors:  Paul L Morgan; George Farkas; Qiong Wu
Journal:  J Learn Disabil       Date:  2011-08-19

4.  A Short-Term Longitudinal Study of the Relationship between Motivation to Read and Reading Fluency Skill in Second Grade.

Authors:  Matthew Quirk; Paula J Schwanenflugel; Mi-Young Webb
Journal:  J Lit Res       Date:  2009-04-01

5.  Are reading and behavior problems risk factors for each other?

Authors:  Paul L Morgan; George Farkas; Paula A Tufis; Rayne A Sperling
Journal:  J Learn Disabil       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct

6.  Impact of missing data mechanism on the estimate of change: a case study on cognitive function and polypharmacy among older persons.

Authors:  Piia Lavikainen; Esko Leskinen; Sirpa Hartikainen; Jyrki Möttönen; Raimo Sulkava; Maarit J Korhonen
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 4.790

7.  Motivational Spiral Models (MSM): common and distinct motivations in context.

Authors:  Laurel J Fisher
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2013-10-25

8.  Establishing a Longitudinal Comparable Scale of Chinese Children's Cognitive Development through Calibrated Projection Linking.

Authors:  Xiangzi Ouyang; Qiusi Zhang; Tao Xin; Fu Liu
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-02-22

9.  Reading self-perceived ability, enjoyment and achievement: A genetically informative study of their reciprocal links over time.

Authors:  Margherita Malanchini; Zhe Wang; Ivan Voronin; Victoria J Schenker; Robert Plomin; Stephen A Petrill; Yulia Kovas
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2017-04

10.  A New Measure of Reading Habit: Going Beyond Behavioral Frequency.

Authors:  Fabian T C Schmidt; Jan Retelsdorf
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-09-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.