Literature DB >> 12396217

Cleaning symbioses from the parasites' perspective.

A S Grutter1.   

Abstract

Cleaning behaviour has generally been viewed from the cleaner or client's point of view. Few studies, however, have examined cleaning behaviour from the parasites' perspective, yet they are the equally-important third players in such associations. All three players are likely to have had their evolution affected by the association. As cleaner organisms are important predators of parasites, cleaners are likely to have an important effect on their prey. Little, however, is known of how parasites are affected by cleaning associations and the strategies that parasites use in response to cleaners. I examine here what parasites are involved in cleaning interactions, the effect cleaners have on parasites, the potential counteradaptations that parasites have evolved against the predatory activities of cleaner organisms, the potential influence of cleaners on the life history traits of parasites, and other factors affected by cleaners. I have found that a wide range of ectoparasites from diverse habitats have been reported to interact with a wide range of cleaner organisms. Some of the life history traits of parasites are consistent with the idea that they are in response to cleaner predation. It is clear, however, that although many cleaning systems exist their ecological role is largely unexplored. This has likely been hindered by our lack of information on the parasites involved in cleaning interactions.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12396217     DOI: 10.1017/s0031182002001488

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Parasitology        ISSN: 0031-1820            Impact factor:   3.234


  9 in total

1.  Cleaner wrasse prefer client mucus: support for partner control mechanisms in cleaning interactions.

Authors:  Alexandra S Grutter; Redouan Bshary
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Shrimps remove ectoparasites from fishes in temperate waters.

Authors:  Sara Ostlund-Nilsson; Justine H A Becker; Göran E Nilsson
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2005-12-22       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Grouping behaviour impacts on the parasitic pressure and squamation of sharks.

Authors:  Humberto G Ferrón; Jose F Palacios-Abella
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 5.530

4.  Lethal and sublethal impacts of a micropredator on post-settlement Caribbean reef fishes.

Authors:  Joseph C Sellers; Daniel M Holstein; Tarryn L Botha; Paul C Sikkel
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Host introduction and parasites: a case study on the parasite community of the peacock grouper Cephalopholis argus (Serranidae) in the Hawaiian Islands.

Authors:  Matthias Vignon; Pierre Sasal; René Galzin
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2008-11-12       Impact factor: 2.289

6.  Long-term effects of the cleaner fish Labroides dimidiatus on coral reef fish communities.

Authors:  Peter A Waldie; Simon P Blomberg; Karen L Cheney; Anne W Goldizen; Alexandra S Grutter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Beyond symbiosis: cleaner shrimp clean up in culture.

Authors:  Thane A Militz; Kate S Hutson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Hooked on you: shape of attachment structures in cymothoid isopods reflects parasitic strategy.

Authors:  Charles Baillie; Rachel L Welicky; Kerry A Hadfield; Nico J Smit; Stefano Mariani; Robin M D Beck
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 3.260

9.  Functional morphology of parasitic isopods: understanding morphological adaptations of attachment and feeding structures in Nerocila as a pre-requisite for reconstructing the evolution of Cymothoidae.

Authors:  Christina Nagler; Joachim T Haug
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 2.984

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.