AIMS: To determine the effects on homocysteine levels of two doses of folic acid compared to placebo, where the high dose is typical of that provided by pharmacological intervention and the low dose approximates that provided by dietary supplementation. METHODS AND RESULTS: The PACIFIC study was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, factorial randomized trial. Seven hundred and twenty-three individuals with a history of myocardial infarction or unstable angina were recruited from 28 clinical cardiology centres in Australia and New Zealand and randomized tofolic acid 2.0 mg daily, folic acid 0.2 mg daily or placebo. The primary outcome, homocysteine, was measured using a fluorescence polarization immunoassay. Compared to placebo, 2.0 mg folic acid reduced homo-cysteine by 1.8 micromol x 1(-1) [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.3-2.3] and 0.2 mg reduced homocysteine by 1.2 micromol x 1(-1) [95% CI 0.8-1.7). The higher dose reduced homocysteine significantly more than the lower dose (P=001). CONCLUSIONS: Both doses of folic acidreduced homocysteine, but the effects of the 2.0 mg dose were about one third greater than the 0.2 mg dose. Fortification of foods with folic acid should result in population-wide lower levels of homocysteine but high-dose pharmacological supplementation would produce greater reductions for high-risk individuals.
RCT Entities:
AIMS: To determine the effects on homocysteine levels of two doses of folic acid compared to placebo, where the high dose is typical of that provided by pharmacological intervention and the low dose approximates that provided by dietary supplementation. METHODS AND RESULTS: The PACIFIC study was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, factorial randomized trial. Seven hundred and twenty-three individuals with a history of myocardial infarction or unstable angina were recruited from 28 clinical cardiology centres in Australia and New Zealand and randomized to folic acid 2.0 mg daily, folic acid 0.2 mg daily or placebo. The primary outcome, homocysteine, was measured using a fluorescence polarization immunoassay. Compared to placebo, 2.0 mg folic acid reduced homo-cysteine by 1.8 micromol x 1(-1) [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.3-2.3] and 0.2 mg reduced homocysteine by 1.2 micromol x 1(-1) [95% CI 0.8-1.7). The higher dose reduced homocysteine significantly more than the lower dose (P=001). CONCLUSIONS: Both doses of folic acid reduced homocysteine, but the effects of the 2.0 mg dose were about one third greater than the 0.2 mg dose. Fortification of foods with folic acid should result in population-wide lower levels of homocysteine but high-dose pharmacological supplementation would produce greater reductions for high-risk individuals.