Literature DB >> 12395486

Medical students' gender is a predictor of success in the obstetrics and gynecology basic clerkship.

Jessica L Bienstock1, Shari Martin, Wendy Tzou, Harold E Fox.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to investigate whether a gender difference exists in student performance on any component of the grading scheme in an obstetrics and gynecology clerkship.
METHODS: Evaluation of medical students' performance in the obstetrics and gynecology clerkship at our institution includes an Objective Standardized Clinical Examination with an interpersonal skills subsection, a written examination, and faculty evaluations. Performance data from 355 medical students enrolled in the clerkship between 1995 to 1998 were analyzed.
RESULTS: Female students performed better than their male colleagues on the written examination (d = .56), the overall Objective Standardized Clinical Examination (d = .46) and its interpersonal skills subsection (d = .49), and the final clerkship score (d = .48). There were no differences between male and female students in faculty evaluation scores. Female students received better final scores for the clerkship.
CONCLUSIONS: Female students performed about 1/2 standard deviation better on the majority of the assessment tools used in the obstetrics and gynecology clerkship.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12395486     DOI: 10.1207/S15328015TLM1404_7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Teach Learn Med        ISSN: 1040-1334            Impact factor:   2.414


  9 in total

1.  Comparing performance among male and female candidates in sex-specific clinical knowledge in the MRCGP.

Authors:  A Niroshan Siriwardena; Bill Irish; Zahid B Asghar; Hilton Dixon; Paul Milne; Catherine Neden; Jo Richardson; Carol Blow
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  "Making the grade:" noncognitive predictors of medical students' clinical clerkship grades.

Authors:  Katherine B Lee; Sanjeev N Vaishnavi; Steven K M Lau; Dorothy A Andriole; Donna B Jeffe
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.798

3.  Gender Bias in Simulation-Based Assessments of Emergency Medicine Residents.

Authors:  Jeffrey N Siegelman; Michelle Lall; Lindsay Lee; Tim P Moran; Joshua Wallenstein; Bijal Shah
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2018-08

4.  Challenging students to formulate written questions: a randomized controlled trial to assess learning effects.

Authors:  Marleen Olde Bekkink; A R T Rogier Donders; Jan G Kooloos; Rob Mw de Waal; Dirk J Ruiter
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2015-03-21       Impact factor: 2.463

5.  Undergraduate medical students need more training in craniomaxillofacial surgery: a comparative study between medical and dental students.

Authors:  Lukas B Seifert; Jasmina Sterz; Bernd Bender; Robert Sader; Miriam Ruesseler; Sebastian H Hoefer
Journal:  Innov Surg Sci       Date:  2017-08-03

6.  Gender Disparity in Evaluation of Internal Medicine Clerkship Performance.

Authors:  Deborah J Gorth; Rogan G Magee; Sarah E Rosenberg; Nina Mingioni
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-07-01

7.  Obstetrics and gynecology clerkship for males and females: similar curriculum, different outcomes?

Authors:  LaTasha B Craig; Chad Smith; Sheila M Crow; Whitney Driver; Michelle Wallace; Britta M Thompson
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2013-12-02

8.  Validation of a clinical rotation evaluation for physician assistant students.

Authors:  Ryan A Meverden; Jason H Szostek; Saswati Mahapatra; Cathy D Schleck; Jayawant N Mandrekar; Thomas J Beckman; Christopher M Wittich
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 2.463

9.  Career choices for obstetrics and gynaecology: recent updates from 40 years of national surveys of UK medical graduates.

Authors:  Trevor W Lambert; Fay Smith; Michael J Goldacre
Journal:  JRSM Open       Date:  2019-10-02
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.