Literature DB >> 12395023

Increasing cervical cancer screening among underserved women in a large urban county health system: can it be done? What does it take?

Roshan Bastani1, Barbara A Berman, Thomas R Belin, Lori A Crane, Alfred C Marcus, Kiumarss Nasseri, Nikki Herman-Shipley, Sol Bernstein, Carole E Henneman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Further reduction in avoidable cervical cancer morbidity and mortality may require system-wide, integrated approaches implemented in the public health facilities serving the nation's indigent and minority women.
OBJECTIVES: Report on the evaluation of a 5-year demonstration project testing a multicomponent (provider, system, and patient) intervention to increase cervical cancer screening among women who receive their health care through the Los Angeles County Department of Health Services, the second largest County Health Department in the nation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A longitudinal nonequivalent control group design was utilized. Data were collected during a baseline (no intervention) year and 2.5 years of intervention. A large hospital, one feeder Comprehensive Health Centers (CHC), and three of the health center's feeder Public Health Centers (PHC) received the intervention. Another hospital, CHC and its three feeder PHCs (matched on size, patient characteristics, and range of services provided) served as comparison sites. Independent random samples of patients 18 years and older were drawn annually at each site (n = 18,642). The outcome measure was a receipt of a Papanicolaou smear during a 9-month period.
RESULTS: At the Hospital and CHC levels a statistically significant intervention effect was observed after controlling for baseline screening rates and case mix. No intervention effect was observed at the PHCs.
CONCLUSION: An intensive multicomponent intervention can increase cervical cancer screening in a large, urban, County health system serving a low-income minority population of under screened women. Retention of program elements in the postresearch phase, and the difficulties and importance of conducting this type of research, is described.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12395023     DOI: 10.1097/00005650-200210000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  5 in total

Review 1.  Increasing Cervical Cancer Screening Among US Hispanics/Latinas: A Qualitative Systematic Review.

Authors:  Lilli Mann; Kristie L Foley; Amanda E Tanner; Christina J Sun; Scott D Rhodes
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  The role of family history of cancer on cervical cancer screening behavior in a population-based survey of women in the Southeastern United States.

Authors:  Jessica D Bellinger; Heather M Brandt; James W Hardin; Shalanda A Bynum; Patricia A Sharpe; Dawnyéa Jackson
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2013-05-27

3.  Improving cervical cancer screening rates in an urban HIV clinic.

Authors:  Sara L Cross; Sanaa H Suharwardy; Phani Bodavula; Kenneth Schechtman; E Turner Overton; Nur F Onen; Michael A Lane
Journal:  AIDS Care       Date:  2014-03-13

Review 4.  Cervical cancer screening, diagnosis and treatment interventions for racial and ethnic minorities: a systematic review.

Authors:  Susan B Glick; Amanda R Clarke; Anita Blanchard; Amy K Whitaker
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Challenges and Opportunities to Improve Cervical Cancer Screening Rates in US Health Centers through Patient-Centered Medical Home Transformation.

Authors:  Olga Moshkovich; Lydie Lebrun-Harris; Laura Makaroff; Preeta Chidambaran; Michelle Chung; Alek Sripipatana; Sue C Lin
Journal:  Adv Prev Med       Date:  2015-01-21
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.