Literature DB >> 12395022

Mortality trends during a program that publicly reported hospital performance.

David W Baker1, Doug Einstadter, Charles L Thomas, Scott S Husak, Nahida H Gordon, Randall D Cebul.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether publicly reporting hospitals' risk-adjusted mortality leads to improvements in outcomes.
OBJECTIVES: To examine mortality trends during a period (1991-1997) when the Cleveland Health Quality Choice program was operational. RESEARCH
DESIGN: Time series.
SUBJECTS: Medicare patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction (AMI; n = 10,439), congestive heart failure (CHF; n = 23,505), gastrointestinal hemorrhage (GIH; n = 11,088), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD; n = 8495), pneumonia (n = 23,719), or stroke (n = 14,293). MEASURES: Risk-adjusted in-hospital mortality, early postdischarge mortality (between discharge and 30 days after admission), and 30-day mortality.
RESULTS: Risk-adjusted in-hospital mortality declined significantly for all conditions except stroke and GIH, with absolute declines ranging from -2.1% for COPD to -4.8% for pneumonia. However, the mortality rate in the early postdischarge period rose significantly for all conditions except COPD, with increases ranging from 1.4% for GIH to 3.8% for stroke. As a consequence, the 30-day mortality declined significantly only for CHF (absolute decline 1.4%, 95% CI, -2.5 to -0.1%) and COPD (absolute decline 1.6%, 95% CI, -2.8-0.0%). For stroke, risk-adjusted 30-day mortality actually increased by 4.3% (95% CI, 1.8-7.1%).
CONCLUSION: During Cleveland's experiment with hospital report cards, deaths shifted from in hospital to the period immediately after discharge with little or no net reduction in 30-day mortality for most conditions. Hospital profiling remains an unproven strategy for improving outcomes of care for medical conditions. Using in-hospital mortality rates to monitor trends in outcomes for hospitalized patients may lead to spurious conclusions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12395022     DOI: 10.1097/00005650-200210000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  16 in total

Review 1.  The evolving science of quality measurement for hospitals: implications for studies of competition and consolidation.

Authors:  Patrick S Romano; Ryan Mutter
Journal:  Int J Health Care Finance Econ       Date:  2004-06

2.  Do report cards influence hospital choice? The case of kidney transplantation.

Authors:  David H Howard; Bruce Kaplan
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.730

3.  Overcoming bias in estimating the volume-outcome relationship.

Authors:  Alexander C Tsai; Mark Votruba; John F P Bridges; Randall D Cebul
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Building communities of respect in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Samuel M Brown; Daniel Talmor; Michael D Howell
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2018-06-30       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Comparison of hospital risk-standardized mortality rates calculated by using in-hospital and 30-day models: an observational study with implications for hospital profiling.

Authors:  Elizabeth E Drye; Sharon-Lise T Normand; Yun Wang; Joseph S Ross; Geoffrey C Schreiner; Lein Han; Michael Rapp; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Effect of public reporting on intensive care unit discharge destination and outcomes.

Authors:  Lora A Reineck; Tri Q Le; Christopher W Seymour; Amber E Barnato; Derek C Angus; Jeremy M Kahn
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2015-01

7.  Hospital discharges, readmissions, and ED visits for COPD or bronchiectasis among US adults: findings from the nationwide inpatient sample 2001-2012 and Nationwide Emergency Department Sample 2006-2011.

Authors:  Earl S Ford
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 9.410

8.  Reporting of quality indicators and improvement in hospital performance: the P.Re.Val.E. Regional Outcome Evaluation Program.

Authors:  Cristina Renzi; Chiara Sorge; Danilo Fusco; Nera Agabiti; Marina Davoli; Carlo A Perucci
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  Hospital competition, managed care, and mortality after hospitalization for medical conditions in California.

Authors:  Jeannette Rogowski; Arvind K Jain; José J Escarce
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  Changes in the use of do-not-resuscitate orders after implementation of the Patient Self-Determination Act.

Authors:  David W Baker; Doug Einstadter; Scott Husak; Randall D Cebul
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.