Literature DB >> 12394717

Percutaneous endopyeloplasty: description of new technique.

Inderbir S Gill1, Mihir M Desai, Jihad H Kaouk, Kishore Wani, Mahesh R Desai.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We present a novel technique of percutaneous endopyeloplasty, in which the conventional longitudinal endopyelotomy incision is precisely sutured in a horizontal Heineke-Mikulicz fashion through the solitary percutaneous tract, thus, achieving Fenger-plasty type of repair of the ureteropelvic junction.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Percutaneous endopyeloplasty was performed in 9 patients with primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Essential steps of our novel technique include retrograde placement of a ureteral catheter over a guide wire into the renal pelvis, establishing conventional percutaneous renal access, creating a conventional longitudinal endopyelotomy incision and performing full-thickness horizontal suturing of the endopyelotomy incision in Heineke-Mikulicz fashion. Suturing was done using the novel 5 mm. Sew Right 5 SR laparoscopic suturing device (LSI Solutions, Rochester, New York) passed through the nephroscope.
RESULTS: Percutaneous endopyeloplasty was technically successful in all 9 patients. Mean total operative time was 100.8 minutes (range 62 to 140.), including an endopyeloplasty suturing time of 26.6 minutes (range 14 to 54.). We placed 1 to 4 endopyeloplasty sutures per case. Blood loss was minimal, mean hospital stay was 2.2 days (range 2 to 3) and the ureteral Double-J stent (Medical Engineering Corp., New York, New York) was removed in 2 weeks. At a mean followup of 4 months all operated kidneys showed relief of obstruction, as confirmed by clinical improvement in symptoms and improved renal drainage on excretory urography and diuretic renography.
CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous endopyeloplasty is technically feasible, safe and effective. Potential advantages over conventional endopyelotomy include wider caliber reconstruction of the ureteropelvic junction, full-thickness healing with primary intent, minimal urinary extravasation and shorter stenting duration. To our knowledge the initial clinical experience is presented.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12394717     DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000033906.38424.8d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  4 in total

Review 1.  Comparison of surgical approaches to ureteropelvic junction obstruction: endopyeloplasty versus endopyelotomy versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty.

Authors:  Robert J Stein; Inderbir S Gill; Mihir M Desai
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Percutaneous nephroscopic surgery.

Authors:  Tae-Kon Hwang
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2010-05-19

3.  Minimal invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in low volume pelvis: A comparative study of endopyelotomy and laparoscopic nondismembered pyeloplasty.

Authors:  Pratipal Singh; Paresh Jain; Anand Dharaskar; Anil Mandhani; Deepak Dubey; Rakesh Kapoor; Anant Kumar; Aneesh Srivastava
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2009-01

4.  Adult stentless laparoscopic pyeloplasty.

Authors:  Arieh L Shalhav; Albert A Mikhail; Marcelo A Orvieto; Ofer N Gofrit; Glenn S Gerber; Kevin C Zorn
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2007 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.