Literature DB >> 12393605

Early blast clearance by remission induction therapy is a major independent prognostic factor for both achievement of complete remission and long-term outcome in acute myeloid leukemia: data from the German AML Cooperative Group (AMLCG) 1992 Trial.

Wolfgang Kern1, Torsten Haferlach, Claudia Schoch, Helmut Loffler, Winfried Gassmann, Achim Heinecke, Maria Christina Sauerland, Wolfgang Berdel, Thomas Buchner, Wolfgang Hiddemann.   

Abstract

Risk assessment in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) using pretreatment characteristics may be improved by incorporating parameters of early response to therapy. In the 1992 trial of the German AML Cooperative Group (AMLCG), the amount of residual leukemic blasts in bone marrow was assessed one week after the first induction course (day 16 blasts). A total of 449 patients 16 to 76 years of age (median, 53 years) with de novo AML entered the trial and were evaluable. Treatment included TAD/HAM (thioguanine, cytosine arabinoside, and daunorubicin/high-dose cytosine arabinoside and mitoxantrone) double induction, TAD consolidation, and randomly either maintenance therapy or S-HAM consolidation. Cytogenetics were favorable, intermediate, unfavorable and not available in 10.0%, 48.3%, 13.1%, and 28.5%, respectively. Day 16 blasts ranged from 0% to 100% (median, 5%, mean +/- SD, 18.6 +/- 28.5%). Complete remission (CR) rate was 72.6%, 17.6% had persistent leukemia (PL), and 9.8% succumbed to hypoplastic death. Median overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS), and relapse-free survival (RFS) were 18, 9, and 15 months with 28.4%, 21.6%, and 30.1% at 5 years, respectively. As a continuous variable, day 16 blasts were related to CR rate (P < 0.0001), PL rate (P < 0.0001), OS (P < 0.0001), EFS (P < 0.0001), and RFS (P = 0.0049). Multivariate analyses identified the following parameters to be associated with the respective end points. CR rate: day 16 blasts (P <.0001), age (P =.0036), and LDH (P =.0072); OS: unfavorable cytogenetics (P <.0001), day 16 blasts (P <.0001), age (P <.0001), and LDH (P =.0040); EFS: unfavorable cytogenetics (P <.0001), LDH (P <.0001), day 16 blasts (P <.0001), and age (P =.0061); RFS: unfavorable cytogenetics (P <.0001), LDH (P <.0001), and day 16 blasts (P =.0359). The prognostic significance of day 16 blasts is independent of pretherapeutic parameters and predicts outcome even in patients achieving a CR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12393605     DOI: 10.1182/blood-2002-02-0532

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN: 0006-4971            Impact factor:   22.113


  56 in total

1.  [Risk-adapted therapy in acute myeloid leukemia].

Authors:  M Fiegl; W Hiddemann
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 2.  Biomarkers and surrogate end points--the challenge of statistical validation.

Authors:  Marc Buyse; Daniel J Sargent; Axel Grothey; Alastair Matheson; Aimery de Gramont
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 66.675

3.  Rapid rate of peripheral blood blast clearance accurately predicts complete remission in acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  V Vainstein; S A Buckley; O Shukron; E H Estey; J L Abkowitz; B L Wood; R B Walter
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 11.528

Review 4.  Bone marrow evaluation for diagnosis and monitoring of acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Mary-Elizabeth Percival; Catherine Lai; Elihu Estey; Christopher S Hourigan
Journal:  Blood Rev       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 8.250

5.  The prognostic significance of early treatment response in pediatric relapsed acute myeloid leukemia: results of the international study Relapsed AML 2001/01.

Authors:  Ursula Creutzig; Martin Zimmermann; Michael N Dworzak; Brenda Gibson; Rienk Tamminga; Jonas Abrahamsson; Shau-Yin Ha; Henrik Hasle; Alexey Maschan; Yves Bertrand; Guy Leverger; Christine von Neuhoff; Bassem Razzouk; Carmelo Rizzari; Petr Smisek; Owen P Smith; Batia Stark; Dirk Reinhardt; Gertjan L Kaspers
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 9.941

6.  Response assessment in acute myeloid leukemia by flow cytometry supersedes cytomorphology at time of aplasia, amends cases without molecular residual disease marker and serves as an independent prognostic marker at time of aplasia and post-induction.

Authors:  Thomas Köhnke; Veit Bücklein; Sandra Rechkemmer; Stephanie Schneider; Maja Rothenberg-Thurley; Klaus H Metzeler; Maria-Cristina Sauerland; Wolfgang Hiddemann; Karsten Spiekermann; Marion Subklewe
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 9.941

7.  Immune landscapes predict chemotherapy resistance and immunotherapy response in acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Jayakumar Vadakekolathu; Mark D Minden; Tressa Hood; Sarah E Church; Stephen Reeder; Heidi Altmann; Amy H Sullivan; Elena J Viboch; Tasleema Patel; Narmin Ibrahimova; Sarah E Warren; Andrea Arruda; Yan Liang; Thomas H Smith; Gemma A Foulds; Michael D Bailey; James Gowen-MacDonald; John Muth; Marc Schmitz; Alessandra Cesano; A Graham Pockley; Peter J M Valk; Bob Löwenberg; Martin Bornhäuser; Sarah K Tasian; Michael P Rettig; Jan K Davidson-Moncada; John F DiPersio; Sergio Rutella
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 17.956

8.  Relationship between white blood cell count elevation and clinical response after G-CSF priming chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Daisuke Minakata; Shin-Ichiro Fujiwara; Takashi Ikeda; Yumiko Toda; Shoko Ito; Kiyomi Mashima; Kento Umino; Hirofumi Nakano; Ryoko Yamasaki; Kaoru Morita; Yasufumi Kawasaki; Miyuki Sugimoto; Chihiro Yamamoto; Masahiro Ashizawa; Kaoru Hatano; Kazuya Sato; Iekuni Oh; Ken Ohmine; Kazuo Muroi; Yoshinobu Kanda
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 2.490

Review 9.  Management of primary refractory acute myeloid leukemia in the era of targeted therapies.

Authors:  Christine M McMahon; Alexander E Perl
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2018-09-20

10.  Overexpression of X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein (XIAP) is an independent unfavorable prognostic factor in childhood de novo acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Ki Woong Sung; Jaewon Choi; Yu Kyeong Hwang; Sang Jin Lee; Hee-Jin Kim; Ju Youn Kim; Eun Joo Cho; Keon Hee Yoo; Hong Hoe Koo
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 2.153

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.