Literature DB >> 12392861

The use of handheld computers in clinical trials.

Andreas Koop1, Ralph Mösges.   

Abstract

A recently completed, randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial is presented in which Palm handheld computers were used as a substitute for normal paper-based patient diaries. In this nasal provocation study, a common antihistamine approved for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis was tested against placebo for evidence of additional properties. In addition to their medical examinations, the 12 study volunteers rated subjective complaints in a diary program on 4 examination days, for a duration of 4.5 hours every 15 minutes at each visit. This resulted in 903 data sets consisting of five questions each, or 4515 data points total. In this study the use of handheld computers resulted in an increase in data quality and shortened the time needed to close the database. Moreover, the benefit of electronic reminders for protocol compliance is clearly demonstrated. Our findings support the results found in the literature we reviewed. For more than 16 years, mobile computers have been supporting the implementation of clinical trials. Our review of 27 articles out of more than 100 clinical trials in which mobile computers have been used elaborates on the advantages and problems of this technology. We give a comprehensive overview of the various technologies as used in different settings, and then discuss the methodology of using mobile devices in comparison to traditional methods, the considerations that need to be made and things to be avoided in order to conduct a successful clinical trial with mobile tools. We conclude that mobile devices are very useful in most cases, especially when design and software validation aspects have been taken into account. Copyright 2002 Elsevier Science Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12392861     DOI: 10.1016/s0197-2456(02)00224-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Control Clin Trials        ISSN: 0197-2456


  17 in total

Review 1.  Electronic data capture for registries and clinical trials in orthopaedic surgery: open source versus commercial systems.

Authors:  Jatin Shah; Dimple Rajgor; Shreyasee Pradhan; Mariana McCready; Amrapali Zaveri; Ricardo Pietrobon
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Personal digital assistants are comparable to traditional diaries for dietary self-monitoring during a weight loss program.

Authors:  Bethany A Yon; Rachel K Johnson; Jean Harvey-Berino; Beth Casey Gold; Alan B Howard
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2007-01-10

Review 3.  Mediators of asthma outcomes.

Authors:  Cynthia S Rand; Rosalind J Wright; Michael D Cabana; Michael B Foggs; Jill S Halterman; Lynn Olson; William M Vollmer; Sandra R Wilson; Virginia Taggart
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 10.793

4.  Performance of health status measures with a pen based personal digital assistant.

Authors:  T K Kvien; P Mowinckel; T Heiberg; K L Dammann; Ø Dale; G J Aanerud; T N Alme; T Uhlig
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2005-04-20       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 5.  Measures of asthma control.

Authors:  Christian Bime; Jessica Nguyen; Robert A Wise
Journal:  Curr Opin Pulm Med       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.155

6.  Photo-Assisted Dietary Method Improves Estimates of Dietary Intake Among People with Sleeve Gastrectomy.

Authors:  Ebaa Al-Ozairi; Manar M AlAwadhi; Jumana Al Kandari; Etab Taghadom; Mohammad Abdullah; Carel W Le Roux
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 4.129

7.  Personal digital assistant data capture: the future of quality of life measurement in prostate cancer treatment.

Authors:  Andrew G Matthew; Kristen L Currie; Paul Ritvo; Robert Nam; Michael E Nesbitt; Robin W Kalnin; John Trachtenberg
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.840

8.  Daily diaries vs retrospective questionnaires to assess asthma control and therapeutic responses in asthma clinical trials: is participant burden worth the effort?

Authors:  Adesua Y Okupa; Christine A Sorkness; David T Mauger; Daniel J Jackson; Robert F Lemanske
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 9.410

9.  Daytime symptoms in primary insomnia: a prospective analysis using ecological momentary assessment.

Authors:  Daniel J Buysse; Wesley Thompson; John Scott; Peter L Franzen; Anne Germain; Martica Hall; Douglas E Moul; Eric A Nofzinger; David J Kupfer
Journal:  Sleep Med       Date:  2007-03-23       Impact factor: 3.492

10.  Development and functionality of a handheld computer program to improve fruit and vegetable intake among low-income youth.

Authors:  Nicole L Nollen; Tresza Hutcheson; Susan Carlson; Michael Rapoff; Kathy Goggin; Carlene Mayfield; Edward Ellerbeck
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2012-09-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.