INTRODUCTION: The timed 'Up & Go' (TUG) is a performance test identifying problems in functional mobility. More knowledge on how the type of chair used influences test results is needed. OBJECTIVE: To investigate inter-rater agreement on the time score and to assess if chair type used influenced the performance of the test. SETTING: (1) Inter-rater agreement investigation on the time score was carried out with elderly individuals living in a retirement home (n = 31). (2) Four types of chairs were tested on elderly individuals in three different health care centres (n = 100). RESULTS: The two observers were close in timing (mean difference = 0.04 s). From a reference chair the median time for TUG was 15.7 s compared with 16.9 s from a chair with a low seat (p < 0.001). It was significantly more difficult to stand up from a chair without armrests (p < 0.001), and from the lowest chair (p < 0.001), which was also the only chair difficult to sit down on (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: The inter-rater agreement of the time scoring of the TUG has been confirmed. Test performance is dependent on chair type; chairs with armrests and a seating height of 44-47 cm should be used. Clinicians must follow standard procedures and equipment when using the test or else risk invalidating test findings.
INTRODUCTION: The timed 'Up & Go' (TUG) is a performance test identifying problems in functional mobility. More knowledge on how the type of chair used influences test results is needed. OBJECTIVE: To investigate inter-rater agreement on the time score and to assess if chair type used influenced the performance of the test. SETTING: (1) Inter-rater agreement investigation on the time score was carried out with elderly individuals living in a retirement home (n = 31). (2) Four types of chairs were tested on elderly individuals in three different health care centres (n = 100). RESULTS: The two observers were close in timing (mean difference = 0.04 s). From a reference chair the median time for TUG was 15.7 s compared with 16.9 s from a chair with a low seat (p < 0.001). It was significantly more difficult to stand up from a chair without armrests (p < 0.001), and from the lowest chair (p < 0.001), which was also the only chair difficult to sit down on (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: The inter-rater agreement of the time scoring of the TUG has been confirmed. Test performance is dependent on chair type; chairs with armrests and a seating height of 44-47 cm should be used. Clinicians must follow standard procedures and equipment when using the test or else risk invalidating test findings.
Authors: B Ordahan; A Y Karahan; A Basaran; G Turkoglu; S Kucuksarac; M Cubukcu; L Tekin; A D Polat; B Kuran Journal: Hippokratia Date: 2015 Apr-Jun Impact factor: 0.471
Authors: Adam Baus; Keith Zullig; Dustin Long; Charles Mullett; Cecil Pollard; Henry Taylor; Jeffrey Coben Journal: Perspect Health Inf Manag Date: 2016-04-01
Authors: Carol Ewing Garber; Mary L Greaney; Deborah Riebe; Claudio R Nigg; Patricia A Burbank; Phillip G Clark Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2010-02-03 Impact factor: 3.921
Authors: Sebastiana Z Kalula; Monica Ferreira; George H Swingler; Motasim Badri; Avan A Sayer Journal: Afr Health Sci Date: 2017-09 Impact factor: 0.927