Literature DB >> 12392238

Disability assessment by a single rater or a team: a comparative study with the Catz-Itzkovich spinal cord independence measure.

Amiram Catz1, Malka Itzkovich, Flavia Steinberg, Ora Philo, Haim Ring, Jacob Ronen, Raluca Spasser, Reuven Gepstein, Ada Tamir.   

Abstract

The Catz-Itzkovich Spinal Cord Independence Measure was found to be reliable and more sensitive than the FIM to functional changes, when used by a multidisciplinary team. This study was performed to find out whether assessment may be similar when done by a single rater. Twenty-eight patients with spinal cord lesions participated in the study, in which examinations performed within a week by a single nurse or a team were compared for correlation, differences and agreement. The team members scored their relevant fields. A significant correlation was found between the nurse's scoring and that of physiotherapists and occupational therapists (r = 0.82-0.94; p < 0.0001), and the differences between the mean scores were small. The agreement between raters was modest, however (total agreement 38-90%, Kappa 0.17-0.73). It was concluded that although disability assessment performed by a single nurse may not be as accurate as by a multidisciplinary team, it could be reliable and valid.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12392238     DOI: 10.1080/165019702760279224

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rehabil Med        ISSN: 1650-1977            Impact factor:   2.912


  5 in total

1.  Validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of Spinal Cord Independence Measure-III.

Authors:  H Unalan; T O Misirlioglu; B Erhan; M Akyuz; B Gunduz; E Irgi; H E Arslan; A Baltacı; S Aslan; D Palamar; A Kutlu; J Majlesi; U Akarırmak; S S Karamehmetoglu
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 2.772

2.  Preferences of adults with spinal cord injury for widely used health-related quality of life and subjective well-being measures.

Authors:  Alina Ionela Palimaru; William E Cunningham; Marcus Dillistone; Arturo Vargas-Bustamante; Honghu Liu; Ron D Hays
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 1.985

Review 3.  Assessment of disability in patients with acute traumatic spinal cord injury: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Julio C Furlan; Vanessa Noonan; Anoushka Singh; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2010-08-28       Impact factor: 5.269

4.  Despite limitations in content range, the SCIM-III is reproducible and a valid indicator of physical function in youths with spinal cord injury and dysfunction.

Authors:  M J Mulcahey; Christina Calhoun Thielen; Cristina Sadowsky; Jennifer L Silvestri; Rebecca Martin; Lauren White; Julie A Cagney; Lawrence C Vogel; Jennifer Schottler; Loren Davidson; Ingrid Parry; Heather B Taylor; Kristine Higgins; Michelle L Feltz; Rebecca Sinko; Jackie Bultman; Jenny Mazurkiewicz; John Gaughan
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 2.772

5.  Adaptation and validation of the Spanish self-report version of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM III).

Authors:  M Aguilar-Rodríguez; L Peña-Pachés; C Grao-Castellote; F Torralba-Collados; D Hervás-Marín; M Giner-Pascual
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 2.772

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.