OBJECTIVE: Individuals' recollections of the number and type of health service encounters are frequently required for health economic studies. We sought to establish whether the accuracy of self-reported healthcare resource utilization is a function of the duration of the recall period and the saliency of the health service encounter. METHODS: Patient recollections of a range of community services (general practitioner visits, community midwifery visits) and hospital services (accident and emergency attendances, hospital outpatient attendances, inpatient admissions) over 4-month and 8-month time periods were obtained from women participating in a randomized controlled trial. Comparisons were made with healthcare resource utilization data extracted from medical records. Where significant differences were identified between the self-reported and medically recorded data, a multivariate linear regression model was constructed to identify the factors associated with underreporting and overreporting of healthcare resource utilization. RESULTS: The study revealed a tendency to underreport community service utilization, which appears to be exacerbated when the recall period is extended. A number of sociodemographic and clinical factors significantly associated with this tendency to underreport community service utilization were identified. The self-reporting of hospital service utilization over varying periods of recall was found to be more accurate. CONCLUSION: It is important that economic analysts establish optimal methods for estimating resource utilization quantities within health economic analytical designs. In particular, greater emphasis should be placed on extracting information on community service utilization from medical records or routine health service information systems.
OBJECTIVE: Individuals' recollections of the number and type of health service encounters are frequently required for health economic studies. We sought to establish whether the accuracy of self-reported healthcare resource utilization is a function of the duration of the recall period and the saliency of the health service encounter. METHODS:Patient recollections of a range of community services (general practitioner visits, community midwifery visits) and hospital services (accident and emergency attendances, hospital outpatient attendances, inpatient admissions) over 4-month and 8-month time periods were obtained from women participating in a randomized controlled trial. Comparisons were made with healthcare resource utilization data extracted from medical records. Where significant differences were identified between the self-reported and medically recorded data, a multivariate linear regression model was constructed to identify the factors associated with underreporting and overreporting of healthcare resource utilization. RESULTS: The study revealed a tendency to underreport community service utilization, which appears to be exacerbated when the recall period is extended. A number of sociodemographic and clinical factors significantly associated with this tendency to underreport community service utilization were identified. The self-reporting of hospital service utilization over varying periods of recall was found to be more accurate. CONCLUSION: It is important that economic analysts establish optimal methods for estimating resource utilization quantities within health economic analytical designs. In particular, greater emphasis should be placed on extracting information on community service utilization from medical records or routine health service information systems.
Authors: Ronny Bruffaerts; Jose Posada-Villa; Ali Obaid Al-Hamzawi; Oye Gureje; Yueqin Huang; Chiyi Hu; Evelyn J Bromet; Maria Carmen Viana; Hristo Ruskov Hinkov; Elie G Karam; Guilherme Borges; Silvia E Florescu; David R Williams; Koen Demyttenaere; Viviane Kovess-Masfety; Herbert Matschinger; Daphna Levinson; Giovanni de Girolamo; Yutaka Ono; Ron de Graaf; Mark Oakley Browne; Brendan Bunting; Miguel Xavier; Josep Maria Haro; Ronald C Kessler Journal: Br J Psychiatry Date: 2014-11-13 Impact factor: 9.319
Authors: Fiona Lobban; Nadia Akers; Duncan Appelbe; Rossella Iraci Capuccinello; Lesley Chapman; Lizzi Collinge; Susanna Dodd; Sue Flowers; Bruce Hollingsworth; Mahsa Honary; Sonia Johnson; Steven H Jones; Ceu Mateus; Barbara Mezes; Elizabeth Murray; Katerina Panagaki; Naomi Rainford; Heather Robinson; Anna Rosala-Hallas; William Sellwood; Andrew Walker; Paula R Williamson Journal: Health Technol Assess Date: 2020-06 Impact factor: 4.014
Authors: Ronny Bruffaerts; Koen Demyttenaere; Irving Hwang; Wai-Tat Chiu; Nancy Sampson; Ronald C Kessler; Jordi Alonso; Guilherme Borges; Giovanni de Girolamo; Ron de Graaf; Silvia Florescu; Oye Gureje; Chiyi Hu; Elie G Karam; Norito Kawakami; Stanislav Kostyuchenko; Viviane Kovess-Masfety; Sing Lee; Daphna Levinson; Herber Matschinger; Jose Posada-Villa; Rajesh Sagar; Kate M Scott; Dan J Stein; Toma Tomov; Maria Carmen Viana; Matthew K Nock Journal: Br J Psychiatry Date: 2011-01-24 Impact factor: 9.319
Authors: Theodore A Omachi; Paul D Blanc; David M Claman; Hubert Chen; Edward H Yelin; Laura Julian; Patricia P Katz Journal: Sleep Med Date: 2012-03-18 Impact factor: 3.492
Authors: Gabriele Kohlboeck; Marcel Romanos; Christina M Teuner; Rolf Holle; Carla M T Tiesler; Barbara Hoffmann; Beate Schaaf; Irina Lehmann; Olf Herbarth; Sibylle Koletzko; Carl-Peter Bauer; Andrea von Berg; Dietrich Berdel; Joachim Heinrich Journal: Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2013-12-11 Impact factor: 4.785