Literature DB >> 12391943

Clinical and cost-effectiveness of donepezil, rivastigmine, and galantamine for Alzheimer's disease. A systematic review.

Andrew Clegg1, Jackie Bryant, Tricia Nicholson, Linda McIntyre, Sofie De Broe, Karen Gerard, Norman Waugh.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Systematic review of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of donepezil, rivastigmine, and galantamine for people suffering from Alzheimer's disease.
METHODS: Sixteen electronic databases (including MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, and Embase) and bibliographies of related papers were searched for published/unpublished English language studies, and experts and pharmaceutical companies were consulted for additional information. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and economic studies were selected. Clinical effectiveness was assessed on measurement scales assessing progression of Alzheimer's disease on the person's global health, cognition, functional ability, behavior and mood, and quality of life. Cost-effectiveness was presented as incremental cost per year spent in a nonsevere state (by Mini Mental Health State Examination) or quality-adjusted life-year.
RESULTS: Twelve of 15 RCTs included were judged to be of good quality. Although donepezil had beneficial effects in Alzheimer's patients on global health and cognition, rivastigmine on global health, and galantamine on global health, cognition, and functional scales, these improvements were small and may not be clinically significant. Measures of quality of life and behavior and mood were rarely assessed. Adverse effects were usually mild and transient. Cost-effectiveness base case estimates ranged from 2,415 Pounds savings to 49,476 Pounds additional cost (1997 prices) per unit of effect for donepezil and a small savings for rivastigmine. Estimates were not considered robust or generalizable.
CONCLUSIONS: Donepezil, rivastigmine, and galantamine appear to have some clinical effect for people with Alzheimer's disease, although the extent to which these translate into real differences in everyday life remains unclear. Due to the nature of current economic studies, cost-effectiveness remains uncertain and the impact on different care sectors has been inadequately investigated. Further research is needed to establish the actual benefits of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (AChEls) for people with Alzheimer's disease and their caregivers, the relationship of these changes to clinical management, and careful prospective evaluation of resource and budgetary consequences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12391943     DOI: 10.1017/s026646230200034x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care        ISSN: 0266-4623            Impact factor:   2.188


  20 in total

Review 1.  Size of the treatment effect on cognition of cholinesterase inhibition in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  K Rockwood
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 10.154

2.  Long-term cost-effectiveness of donepezil for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Stefan J Teipel; Michael Ewers; Veronika Reisig; Bernd Schweikert; Harald Hampel; Michael Happich
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2007-04-01       Impact factor: 5.270

Review 3.  Evidence from clinical trials: can we do better?

Authors:  Andrew D Siderowf
Journal:  NeuroRx       Date:  2004-07

4.  Disease progression and costs of care in Alzheimer's disease patients treated with donepezil: a longitudinal naturalistic cohort.

Authors:  Anders Gustavsson; Linus Jönsson; Johan Parmler; Niels Andreasen; Carina Wattmo; Åsa K Wallin; Lennart Minthon
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2011-08-06

Review 5.  Rivastigmine for Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Jacqueline S Birks; Lee Yee Chong; John Grimley Evans
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-09-22

Review 6.  Diagnosis and treatment of dementia: 5. Nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic therapy for mild to moderate dementia.

Authors:  David B Hogan; Peter Bailey; Sandra Black; Anne Carswell; Howard Chertkow; Barry Clarke; Carole Cohen; John D Fisk; Dorothy Forbes; Malcolm Man-Son-Hing; Krista Lanctôt; Debra Morgan; Lilian Thorpe
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 7.  The estimation of utility weights in cost-utility analysis for mental disorders: a systematic review.

Authors:  Michael Sonntag; Hans-Helmut König; Alexander Konnopka
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.981

8.  Progress update: Pharmacological treatment of Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  David B Hogan
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.570

9.  Comparison of persistence rates of acetylcholine-esterase inhibitors in a state Medicaid program.

Authors:  Susan M Abughosh; Stephen J Kogut
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2008-02-02       Impact factor: 2.711

10.  Dementia care initiative in primary practice: study protocol of a cluster randomized trial on dementia management in a general practice setting.

Authors:  Rolf Holle; Elmar Grässel; Stefan Ruckdäschel; Sonja Wunder; Hilmar Mehlig; Peter Marx; Olaf Pirk; Martin Butzlaff; Simone Kunz; Jörg Lauterberg
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-06-06       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.