BACKGROUND: The health and economic impact of vancomycin-resistant enterococci has not been quantified. METHODS: A retrospective matched cohort study was conducted comparing the outcomes of patients with vancomycin-resistant enterococci (cases) with those of control subjects matched for length of hospital stay until inclusion in the cohort, hospital location, and calendar date. The propensity to be a vancomycin-resistant enterococci case was modeled based on patient characteristics, and included in multivariable models to adjust for confounding. Analyses included the following: (1) conditional logistic regression for mortality, surgery, intensive care unit admission, and discharge to long-term care; (2) linear regression for the logarithm of cost; and (3) accelerated failure time model for length of stay. RESULTS: A total of 233 cases were compared with 647 controls. Groups were similar in age (mean, 62 years), sex (female, 47%), and length of stay before inclusion in the cohort (mean, 8.1 days), but differed in primary diagnosis and comorbidities, past infection or colonization with methicillin sodium-resistant Staphylococcus aureus or Clostridium difficile, and treatment with cephalosporins or metronidazole. These variables were included in the propensity score, which had good to excellent prediction. Outcomes for cases vs controls and adjusted risks (relative risks [RRs]) were as follows: (1) case fatality rate, 17% vs 6% (RR, 2.13; P =.04); (2) length of stay after inclusion in the cohort, 15.1 vs 8.5 days (RR, 1.73; P<.001); (3) hospital costs, $52 449 vs $31 915 (RR, 1.40; P<.001); (4) surgery after inclusion in the cohort, 18% vs 10% (RR, 2.74; P =.001); (5) intensive care unit admission after inclusion in the cohort, 25% vs 14% (RR, 3.47; P<.001); and (6) transfer to an institution, 51% vs 35% (RR, 2.01; P =.001). CONCLUSION: Compared with a matched hospital population, a population with vancomycin-resistant enterococci was associated with severe adverse outcomes: increased mortality, morbidity, and costs.
BACKGROUND: The health and economic impact of vancomycin-resistant enterococci has not been quantified. METHODS: A retrospective matched cohort study was conducted comparing the outcomes of patients with vancomycin-resistant enterococci (cases) with those of control subjects matched for length of hospital stay until inclusion in the cohort, hospital location, and calendar date. The propensity to be a vancomycin-resistant enterococci case was modeled based on patient characteristics, and included in multivariable models to adjust for confounding. Analyses included the following: (1) conditional logistic regression for mortality, surgery, intensive care unit admission, and discharge to long-term care; (2) linear regression for the logarithm of cost; and (3) accelerated failure time model for length of stay. RESULTS: A total of 233 cases were compared with 647 controls. Groups were similar in age (mean, 62 years), sex (female, 47%), and length of stay before inclusion in the cohort (mean, 8.1 days), but differed in primary diagnosis and comorbidities, past infection or colonization with methicillin sodium-resistant Staphylococcus aureus or Clostridium difficile, and treatment with cephalosporins or metronidazole. These variables were included in the propensity score, which had good to excellent prediction. Outcomes for cases vs controls and adjusted risks (relative risks [RRs]) were as follows: (1) case fatality rate, 17% vs 6% (RR, 2.13; P =.04); (2) length of stay after inclusion in the cohort, 15.1 vs 8.5 days (RR, 1.73; P<.001); (3) hospital costs, $52 449 vs $31 915 (RR, 1.40; P<.001); (4) surgery after inclusion in the cohort, 18% vs 10% (RR, 2.74; P =.001); (5) intensive care unit admission after inclusion in the cohort, 25% vs 14% (RR, 3.47; P<.001); and (6) transfer to an institution, 51% vs 35% (RR, 2.01; P =.001). CONCLUSION: Compared with a matched hospital population, a population with vancomycin-resistant enterococci was associated with severe adverse outcomes: increased mortality, morbidity, and costs.
Authors: James A McKinnell; Danielle F Kunz; Eric Chamot; Mukesh Patel; Rhett M Shirley; Stephen A Moser; John W Baddley; Peter G Pappas; Loren G Miller Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Date: 2012-05-14 Impact factor: 3.254
Authors: Ashley D Hall Snyder; Brian J Werth; Poochit Nonejuie; John P McRoberts; Joe Pogliano; George Sakoulas; Juwon Yim; Nivedita Singh; Michael J Rybak Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2016-09-23 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Tom A Szakacs; Lindsay Kalan; Michael J McConnell; Alireza Eshaghi; Dea Shahinas; Allison McGeer; Gerry D Wright; Donald E Low; Samir N Patel Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2014-02-12 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Anne M Butler; Margaret A Olsen; Liana R Merz; Rebecca M Guth; Keith F Woeltje; Bernard C Camins; Victoria J Fraser Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 3.254
Authors: Jordan R Smith; Katie E Barber; Animesh Raut; Mostafa Aboutaleb; George Sakoulas; Michael J Rybak Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother Date: 2015-02-01 Impact factor: 5.790