Literature DB >> 12389932

Perpest model, a case-based reasoning approach to predict ecological risks of pesticides.

Paul J van den Brink1, Jan Roelsma, Egbert H Van Nes, Marten Scheffer, Theo C M Brock.   

Abstract

The PERPEST model is a model that predicts the ecological risks of pesticides in freshwater ecosystems. This model simultaneously predicts the effects of a particular concentration of a pesticide on various (community) endpoints. In contrast to most effect models, PERPEST is based on empirical data extracted from the literature. This model is based on case-based reasoning, a technique that solves new problems (e.g., what is the effect of pesticide A?) by using past experience (e.g., published microcosm experiments). The database containing the past experience has been constructed by performing a review of freshwater model ecosystem studies. This review assessed the effects on various endpoints (e.g., community metabolism, phytoplankton, and macroinvertebrates) and classified them according to their magnitude and duration. The PERPEST model searches for analogous situations in the database, based on relevant (toxicity) characteristics of the compound. This allows the model to predict effects of pesticides for which no effects on a semifield scale have been published. The PERPEST model results in a prediction showing the probability of classes of effects (no, slight, or clear effects, plus an optional indication of recovery) on the various grouped endpoints. This paper discusses the scientific background of the model as well as its strengths, limitations, and possible applications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12389932

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem        ISSN: 0730-7268            Impact factor:   3.742


  8 in total

Review 1.  Threshold levels for effects of insecticides in freshwater ecosystems: a review.

Authors:  René P A Van Wijngaarden; Theo C M Brock; Paul J Van den Brink
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.823

Review 2.  Water pollution by agriculture.

Authors:  Brian Moss
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-02-12       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  The combined effects of biotic and abiotic stress on species richness and connectance.

Authors:  Devdutt Kulkarni; Frederik De Laender
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Comparison of predicted aquatic risks of pesticides used under different rice-farming strategies in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam.

Authors:  Nadja Stadlinger; Håkan Berg; Paul J Van den Brink; Nguyen T Tam; Jonas S Gunnarsson
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Assessment of ecotoxicological effects of agrochemicals on bees using the PRIMET model, in the Tiko plain (South-West Cameroon).

Authors:  Daniel Brice Nkontcheu Kenko; Norbert Tchamadeu Ngameni
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-03-21

Review 6.  The pros and cons of ecological risk assessment based on data from different levels of biological organization.

Authors:  Jason R Rohr; Christopher J Salice; Roger M Nisbet
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 6.184

Review 7.  Effects of neonicotinoids and fipronil on non-target invertebrates.

Authors:  L W Pisa; V Amaral-Rogers; L P Belzunces; J M Bonmatin; C A Downs; D Goulson; D P Kreutzweiser; C Krupke; M Liess; M McField; C A Morrissey; D A Noome; J Settele; N Simon-Delso; J D Stark; J P Van der Sluijs; H Van Dyck; M Wiemers
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 4.223

8.  Environmental risk assessment of pesticides in the River Madre de Dios, Costa Rica using PERPEST, SSD, and msPAF models.

Authors:  Robert A Rämö; Paul J van den Brink; Clemens Ruepert; Luisa E Castillo; Jonas S Gunnarsson
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 4.223

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.