Literature DB >> 12389868

Review and evaluation of the potential impact of age- and gender-specific pharmacokinetic differences on tissue dosimetry.

Harvey J Clewell1, Justin Teeguarden, Tracy McDonald, Ramesh Sarangapani, Greg Lawrence, Tammie Covington, Robinan Gentry, Annette Shipp.   

Abstract

In standard risk assessment methods for carcinogenic or noncarcinogenic chemicals, quantitative methods for evaluating interindividual variability are not explicitly considered. These differences are currently considered by the use of statistical confidence limits or default uncertainty factors. This investigation consisted of multiple tasks aimed at making quantitative predictions of interindividual differences in susceptibility by using physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models. Initially, a systematic, comprehensive review of the literature was conducted to identify any quantitative information related to gender- or age-specific physiological and biochemical factors that could influence susceptibility to chemical exposure. These data were then organized from a pharmacokinetic perspective by process and by chemical class to identify key factors likely to have a significant impact on susceptibility as it relates to internal target tissue dose. Overall, a large number of age- and gender-specific quantitative differences in pharmacokinetic parameters were identified. The majority of these differences were identified between neonates/children and adults, with fewer differences identified between young adults and the elderly. The next phase of this work consists of using PBPK models to develop examples of approaches through the development of case studies. The goal of the case studies is to continue to develop a methodology that incorporates PBPK modeling to assess the likelihood that a chemical or class of chemicals may present an age- or gender-specific risk. The case studies should also demonstrate practical methods for quantitatively incorporating information on age- and gender-specific pharmacokinetic differences in risk assessments for chemicals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12389868     DOI: 10.1080/20024091064264

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol        ISSN: 1040-8444            Impact factor:   5.635


  14 in total

1.  Age differences in biological monitoring of chemical exposure: a tentative description using a toxicokinetic model.

Authors:  Tomicic Catherine; Droz Pierre-Olivier
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2008-10-21       Impact factor: 3.015

Review 2.  Gender-specific differences in the central nervous system's response to anesthesia.

Authors:  Lana J Mawhinney; Davita Mabourakh; Michael C Lewis
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 6.829

Review 3.  Sex Differences in Human and Animal Toxicology.

Authors:  Michael Gochfeld
Journal:  Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 1.902

4.  Gender and manganese exposure interactions on mouse striatal neuron morphology.

Authors:  Jennifer L Madison; Michal Wegrzynowicz; Michael Aschner; Aaron B Bowman
Journal:  Neurotoxicology       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 4.294

5.  Remdesivir and GS-441524 Extraction by Ex Vivo Extracorporeal Life Support Circuits.

Authors:  Carina E Imburgia; Joseph E Rower; Danielle J Green; Autumn M Mcknite; Walter E Kelley; Christopher A Reilly; Kevin M Watt
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 3.826

6.  An assessment of the interindividual variability of internal dosimetry during multi-route exposure to drinking water contaminants.

Authors:  Mathieu Valcke; Kannan Krishnan
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Leveraging human genetic and adverse outcome pathway (AOP) data to inform susceptibility in human health risk assessment.

Authors:  Holly M Mortensen; John Chamberlin; Bonnie Joubert; Michelle Angrish; Nisha Sipes; Janice S Lee; Susan Y Euling
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 3.224

Review 8.  Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic factors that can affect sensitivity to neurotoxic sequelae in elderly individuals.

Authors:  Gary Ginsberg; Dale Hattis; Abel Russ; Babasaheb Sonawane
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Aging and the environment: a research framework.

Authors:  Andrew M Geller; Harold Zenick
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Determination of no-observed effect level (NOEL)-biomarker equivalents to interpret biomonitoring data for organophosphorus pesticides in children.

Authors:  Mathieu Valcke; Michèle Bouchard
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2009-02-19       Impact factor: 5.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.