Literature DB >> 12388841

An approach for the quantitative consideration of genetic polymorphism data in chemical risk assessment: examples with warfarin and parathion.

P Robinan Gentry1, C Eric Hack, Lynne Haber, Andrew Maier, Harvey J Clewell.   

Abstract

In recent years, a great deal of research has been conducted to identify genetic polymorphisms. One focus has been to characterize variability in metabolic enzyme systems that could impact internal doses of pharmaceuticals or environmental pollutants. Methods are needed for using this metabolic information to estimate the resulting variability in tissue doses associated with chemical exposure. We demonstrate here the use of physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling in combination with Monte Carlo analysis to incorporate information on polymorphisms into the analysis of toxicokinetic variability. Warfarin and parathion were used as case studies to demonstrate this approach. Our results suggest that polymorphisms in the PON1 gene, that give rise to allelic variants of paraoxonase, which is involved in the metabolism of paraoxon (a metabolite of parathion), make only a minor contribution to the overall variability in paraoxon tissue dose, while polymorphisms in the CYP2C9 gene, which gives rise to allelic variants of the major metabolic enzyme for warfarin, account for a significant portion of the overall variability in (S)-warfarin tissue dose. These analyses were used to estimate chemical-specific adjustment factors (CSAFs) for the human variability in toxicokinetics for both parathion and warfarin. Implications of alternatives in the calculation of CSAFs are explored. Key decision points for applying the PBPK-Monte Carlo approach to evaluate toxicokinetic variability for other chemicals are also discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12388841     DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/70.1.120

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Sci        ISSN: 1096-0929            Impact factor:   4.849


  6 in total

1.  Incorporating human dosimetry and exposure into high-throughput in vitro toxicity screening.

Authors:  Daniel M Rotroff; Barbara A Wetmore; David J Dix; Stephen S Ferguson; Harvey J Clewell; Keith A Houck; Edward L Lecluyse; Melvin E Andersen; Richard S Judson; Cornelia M Smith; Mark A Sochaski; Robert J Kavlock; Frank Boellmann; Matthew T Martin; David M Reif; John F Wambaugh; Russell S Thomas
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2010-07-16       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  Cumulative Risk Assessment (CRA): transforming the way we assess health risks.

Authors:  Pamela R D Williams; G Scott Dotson; Andrew Maier
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 3.  Model systems and organisms for addressing inter- and intra-species variability in risk assessment.

Authors:  Ivan Rusyn; Weihsueh A Chiu; Fred A Wright
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2022-05-28       Impact factor: 3.598

4.  Application of cryopreserved human hepatocytes in trichloroethylene risk assessment: relative disposition of chloral hydrate to trichloroacetate and trichloroethanol.

Authors:  Apryl Bronley-DeLancey; David C McMillan; JoEllyn M McMillan; David J Jollow; Lawrence C Mohr; David G Hoel
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 5.  Current Approaches and Techniques in Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic (PBPK) Modelling of Nanomaterials.

Authors:  Wells Utembe; Harvey Clewell; Natasha Sanabria; Philip Doganis; Mary Gulumian
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 5.076

Review 6.  Dispelling urban myths about default uncertainty factors in chemical risk assessment--sufficient protection against mixture effects?

Authors:  Olwenn V Martin; Scholze Martin; Andreas Kortenkamp
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 5.984

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.