Literature DB >> 12388210

Luminal nutrient signals for intestinal adaptation in pythons.

Stephen M Secor1, John S Lane, Edward E Whang, Stanley W Ashley, Jared Diamond.   

Abstract

Python intestine responds rapidly to luminal nutrients by increasing mass and upregulating nutrient transport. Candidates for luminal signals triggering those responses include mechanical stimulation, single or several dietary nutrients, and endogenous secretions. To identify signals, we infused into the python's small intestine either a nonnutrient solution (saline) or a single- or multinutrient solution. Python intestine failed to respond trophically or functionally to luminal infusions of saline, glucose, lipid, or bile. Infusion of amino acids and peptides, with or without glucose, induced an intermediate response. Infusion of nutritionally complete liquid formula or natural diet induced full intestinal response. Intact meals triggered full intestinal responses without pancreatic or biliary secretions, whereas direct cephalic and gastric stimulation failed to elicit any response. Hence neither physical stimulation (cephalic, gastric, or intestinal) nor the luminal presence of glucose, lipids, or bile can induce intestinal response; instead, a combination of nutrients is required (even without pancreaticobiliary secretions), the most important being amino acids and peptides. This is understandable because pythons, as carnivores, have a high-protein diet.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12388210     DOI: 10.1152/ajpgi.00194.2002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol        ISSN: 0193-1857            Impact factor:   4.052


  7 in total

1.  Separate effects of macronutrient concentration and balance on plastic gut responses in locusts.

Authors:  David Raubenheimer; Kate Bassil
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2007-07-13       Impact factor: 2.200

2.  Morphological changes of the rat intestinal lining in relation to body stores depletion during fasting and after refeeding.

Authors:  Caroline Habold; François Reichardt; Charlotte Foltzer-Jourdainne; Jean-Hervé Lignot
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2007-07-19       Impact factor: 3.657

3.  Rapid changes in gene expression direct rapid shifts in intestinal form and function in the Burmese python after feeding.

Authors:  Audra L Andrew; Daren C Card; Robert P Ruggiero; Drew R Schield; Richard H Adams; David D Pollock; Stephen M Secor; Todd A Castoe
Journal:  Physiol Genomics       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 3.107

4.  Extent of small bowel resection does not influence the magnitude of intestinal adaptation in the mouse.

Authors:  Derek Wakeman; Shannon W Longshore; Mark E McMellen; Jethrina A Santos; Jun Guo; Christopher R Erwin; Brad W Warner
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.545

5.  Postprandial remodeling of the gut microbiota in Burmese pythons.

Authors:  Elizabeth K Costello; Jeffrey I Gordon; Stephen M Secor; Rob Knight
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2010-06-03       Impact factor: 10.302

6.  Multi-species comparisons of snakes identify coordinated signalling networks underlying post-feeding intestinal regeneration.

Authors:  Blair W Perry; Audra L Andrew; Abu Hena Mostafa Kamal; Daren C Card; Drew R Schield; Giulia I M Pasquesi; Mark W Pellegrino; Stephen P Mackessy; Saiful M Chowdhury; Stephen M Secor; Todd A Castoe
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 5.530

7.  Growth and stress response mechanisms underlying post-feeding regenerative organ growth in the Burmese python.

Authors:  Audra L Andrew; Blair W Perry; Daren C Card; Drew R Schield; Robert P Ruggiero; Suzanne E McGaugh; Amit Choudhary; Stephen M Secor; Todd A Castoe
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 3.969

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.