Literature DB >> 12388024

Two-site phacotrabeculectomy with intraoperative mitomycin-C: fornix- versus limbus-based conjunctival opening in fellow eyes.

Vassilios P Kozobolis1, Charalambos S Siganos, Emmanuelle V Christodoulakis, Nikolai P Lazarov, Maria G Koutentaki, Ioannis G Pallikaris.   

Abstract

To prospectively compare the influence of fornix-based and limbus-based conjunctival flaps on the final outcome and complications of 2-site phacotrabeculectomy with mitomycin-C in fellow eyes of patients with bilateral open-angle glaucoma (OAG). Glaucoma Unit, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Crete, Crete, Greece.Twenty-two patients with bilateral primary OAG and 8 patients with bilateral exfoliative glaucoma had 2-site phacotrabeculectomy in both eyes. Eyes were randomly assigned to the fornix-based flap or limbus-based flap group by the use of random tables. The intraocular pressure (IOP) decreased significantly in both groups (P <.01); however, there was no statistically significant difference between the groups in the amount of IOP decrease or the number of postoperative antiglaucoma medications after a 1-year follow-up. Faster improvement in visual acuity was observed in the fornix-based group during the first week. The mean time of surgery was 3.5 minutes less in the fornix-based group. An increased incidence of fibrin exudation, pupillary membrane formation, and capsule opacification was found in eyes with exfoliative glaucoma. The early bleb leakage was 3 times more frequent in the fornix-based group. The type of conjunctival flap in a 2-site phacotrabeculectomy did not seem to influence the final outcome. The main advantage of the fornix-based conjunctival flap is the shorter surgical time and the relatively faster improvement in vision postoperatively. The main disadvantage is more frequent early bleb leakage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12388024     DOI: 10.1016/s0886-3350(02)01270-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  6 in total

1.  Comparison of fornix- and limbus-based conjunctival flaps in mitomycin C trabeculectomy with laser suture lysis in Japanese glaucoma patients.

Authors:  Takeo Fukuchi; Jun Ueda; Kiyoshi Yaoeda; Kieko Suda; Masaaki Seki; Haruki Abe
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 2.  Fornix-Based Versus Limbal-Based Conjunctival Trabeculectomy Flaps for Glaucoma: Findings From a Cochrane Systematic Review.

Authors:  Christiane E Al-Haddad; Marwan Abdulaal; Ahmad Al-Moujahed; Ann-Margret Ervin; Karine Ismail
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 5.258

Review 3.  Fornix-based versus limbal-based conjunctival trabeculectomy flaps for glaucoma.

Authors:  Alex B Theventhiran; Gene Kim; WenJeng Yao
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-08-26

Review 4.  Fornix-based versus limbal-based conjunctival trabeculectomy flaps for glaucoma.

Authors:  Christiane Al-Haddad; Marwan Abdulaal; Ahmad Al-Moujahed; Ann-Margret Ervin
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-11-25

5.  Limbus- versus fornix-based trabeculectomy for open-angle glaucoma eyes with prior ocular surgery: the Collaborative Bleb-Related Infection Incidence and Treatment Study.

Authors:  Satoshi Yokota; Yuji Takihara; Masaru Inatani
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Fornix-based versus limbus-based conjunctival flap in trabeculectomy: a quantitative evaluation of the evidence.

Authors:  Wei Wang; Miao He; Minwen Zhou; Xiulan Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.