Literature DB >> 12387609

Stability of skeletal Class III malocclusion after combined maxillary and mandibular procedures.

F Costa1, M Robiony, S Sembronio, F Polini, M Politi.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the skeletal stability and time course of postoperative changes after surgical correction of skeletal Class III malocclusion. Combined maxillary and mandibular procedures were performed in 40 consecutive patients. Bilateral sagittal split osteotomy stabilized with wire osteosynthesis for mandibular setback and low-level Le Fort I osteotomy stabilized with plates and screws for maxillary advancement were performed. Maxillomandibular fixation (MMF) was in place for 6 weeks. Lateral cephalograms were taken before surgery, immediately postoperatively, 8 weeks after surgery, and 1 year postoperatively. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to vertical maxillary movement at surgery: a maxilla-up group with upward movement of the posterior nasal spine of 2 mm or more (group 1, n = 22), and a minimal vertical change group with less than 2 mm of vertical repositioning (group 2, n = 18). The results indicate that surgical correction of Class III malocclusion with combined maxillary and mandibular osteotomies appears to be fairly stable. One year postsurgery, maxillary stability was excellent, with a mean horizontal relapse at point A that represented 10.7% of maxillary advancement in group 1 and 13.4% in group 2. In the vertical plane, maxillary stability was also excellent, with a mean of 0.18 mm of superior repositioning at point A for group 1 and 1.19 mm for group 2. The mandible relapsed a mean of 2.97 mm horizontally at pogonion in group 1 (62% of mandibular setback) and 3.41 mm (49.7% of setback) in group 2. Bilateral sagittal split osteotomy with wire osteosynthesis and MMF was not as stable as maxillary advancement and accounted for most of the total horizontal relapse (almost 85%) observed. A trend to relapse was observed for maxillary advancement greater than 6 mm, while the single variable accounting for mandibular relapse in group 1 was the amount of surgical setback. Clockwise rotation of the ascending ramus at surgery was not correlated with mandibular relapse in relation to the type of fixation performed and therefore does not seem to be responsible for relapse.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 12387609

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg        ISSN: 0742-1931


  12 in total

1.  Skeletal Relapse After Mandibular Setback in Bi Max Surgery: Intraoral Vertical Ramus versus Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomies.

Authors:  Ra'ed M A Al-Delayme; Moutaz Al-Khen
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2013-08-06

2.  Stability after mandibular setback: mandible-only versus 2-jaw surgery.

Authors:  William R Proffit; Ceib Phillips; Timothy A Turvey
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 1.895

3.  Impact of pain-related temporomandibular disorders on jaw functional limitation, psychological distress and quality of life in postoperative class III East Asian patients.

Authors:  Yi Lin Song; Adrian U-Jin Yap
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2019-07-04       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Soft-tissue changes associated with different surgical procedures for treating class III patients.

Authors:  Mehrangiz Ghassemi; Abdolreza Jamilian; Jenny Rosa Becker; Ali Modabber; Ulrike Fritz; Alireza Ghassemi
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2014-07-06       Impact factor: 1.938

5.  The Prediction Capacity 3-D Software, on a 2-D Analysis, in Planning the Positioning of the Upper Lip After Maxillary Advancement.

Authors:  Letícia Liana Chihara; Jéssica de Fátima Segantin; Paulo Esteves Pinto Faria; Eduardo Sant'Ana; Eduardo Dias-Ribeiro; Renato Luiz Maia Nogueira; Osny Ferreira-Júnior
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2020-02-20

6.  Soft tissue response after Class III bimaxillary surgery.

Authors:  Gundega Jakobsone; Arild Stenvik; Lisen Espeland
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  Long-term stability of surgical-orthodontic correction of class III malocclusions with long-face syndrome.

Authors:  David Gallego-Romero; José-María Llamas-Carrera; Daniel Torres-Lagares; Vanessa Paredes; Eduardo Espinar; Eduardo Guevara; José-Luis Gutiérrez-Pérez
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2012-05-01

8.  A Case of Extreme Skeletal Class III Malocclusion Beyond the Envelope of Discrepancy, Managed Effectively by a Modified Ortho-Surgical Protocol.

Authors:  Priya Jeyaraj; Pankaj Juneja
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2020-03-27

9.  Combined Orthodontic and Surgical Approach in the Correction of a Class III Skeletal Malocclusion with Mandibular Prognathism and Vertical Maxillary Excess Using Bimaxillary Osteotomy.

Authors:  George Jose Cherackal; Eapen Thomas; Akhilesh Prathap
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2013-12-22

10.  Comparison of postoperative changes in the distal and proximal segments between conventional and sliding mini-plate fixation following mandibular setback.

Authors:  Seong-Sik Kim; Kyoung-Ho Kwak; Ching-Chang Ko; Soo-Byung Park; Woo-Sung Son; Yong-Il Kim
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 1.372

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.