Literature DB >> 12387463

Secondary colposuspension: results of a prospective study from a tertiary referral centre.

Ranee Thakar1, Stuart Stanton, Lisa Prodigalidad, Jan den Boon.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the results of secondary colposuspension in women with recurrent urinary stress incontinence.
DESIGN: Prospective cross sectional observational study.
SETTING: Tertiary referral urogynaecology unit. POPULATION: Fifty-six women with recurrent stress incontinence. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Determine prognostic factors that may affect the outcome of surgery, long term subjective and objective success rates and identify complications of secondary colposuspension.
RESULTS: The mean age was 54 years (range 34-83) and the median parity was 3 (range 1-5). The median length of follow up was four years (range 1.01-7.07). Forty-two (75%) women had genuine stress incontinence and 14 (25%) had mixed incontinence on subtracted cystometry. The subjective cure rate was 71% and the objective cure rate was 80% and, as per Kaplan-Meier life time analysis, 65% had not failed surgery five years after the operation. The complication rate was low. However at follow up, eight women had required a posterior colporrhaphy for rectocele and three had a sacrocolpopexy for vault prolapse. Another eight women required further treatment for stress incontinence (seven urethral bulking agents and one tension-free vaginal tape). There was no correlation of the outcome to age, past hysterectomy, number of previous incontinence procedures, parity, body mass index or blood loss at operation.
CONCLUSION: Colposuspension after failed continence surgery has a good outcome with a low complication rate, but many still require further surgery for prolapse.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12387463     DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2002.01377.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJOG        ISSN: 1470-0328            Impact factor:   6.531


  3 in total

1.  Laparoscopic Burch colposuspension after failed sub-urethral tape procedures: a retrospective audit.

Authors:  Eva M De Cuyper; Rozihan Ismail; Christopher F Maher
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2007-12-08

2.  Second-Line Surgical Management After Midurethral Sling Failure.

Authors:  Joonbeom Kwon; Yeonjoo Kim; Duk Yoon Kim
Journal:  Int Neurourol J       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 2.835

3.  Management of recurrent stress urinary incontinence and urinary retention following midurethral sling insertion in women.

Authors:  H Hashim; T R Terry
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.891

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.