Literature DB >> 12387383

Comparison of paste and suspension formulations of omeprazole in the healing of gastric ulcers in racehorses in active training.

Jorge E Nieto1, Sharon Spier, Frank S Pipers, Scott Stanley, Monica R Aleman, Donald C Smith, Jack R Snyder.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare effects of a commercially available omeprazole paste and a compounded omeprazole suspension on healing of gastric ulcers in Thoroughbred racehorses in active training.
DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. ANIMALS: 32 horses with gastric ulcers. PROCEDURE: Horses were assigned to 2 groups on the basis of endoscopic gastric ulcer severity. Group-1 horses were treated with omeprazole suspension for 30 days and with omeprazole paste for an additional 30 days. Group-2 horses were treated with omeprazole paste for 30 days and omeprazole suspension for an additional 30 days. Serum omeprazole concentrations were measured in 4 additional healthy horses after administration of a single dose of each formulation. In all instances, omeprazole was administered at a dose of 4 mg/kg (1.8 mg/lb), p.o..
RESULTS: Ulcer severity scores on day 0 were not significantly different between groups. On day 30, ulcer severity score was significantly decreased, compared with day-0 score, in group-2 but not in group-1 horses. On day 60, ulcer severity score was significantly decreased, compared with day-0 and day-30 scores, in group-1 horses. In group-2 horses, ulcer severity score on day 60 was significantly lower than the day-0 score but was not significantly different from the day-30 score. Maximum observed serum omeprazole concentration and area under the concentration-time curve were significantly higher after administration of the paste versus the suspension formulation. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Results suggest that although administration of the commercially available paste omeprazole formulation was effective in promoting healing of gastric ulcers in these horses, administration of the compounded omeprazole suspension was ineffective.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12387383     DOI: 10.2460/javma.2002.221.1139

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Vet Med Assoc        ISSN: 0003-1488            Impact factor:   1.936


  5 in total

Review 1.  Drug compounding for veterinary patients.

Authors:  Mark G Papich
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2005-09-22       Impact factor: 4.009

2.  Compounding errors in 2 dogs receiving anticonvulsants.

Authors:  Sandra E McConkey; Susan Walker; Cathy Adams
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.008

3.  Potency and stability of compounded formulations of chlorambucil, melphalan and cyclophosphamide.

Authors:  J H Burton; H K Knych; S D Stanley; R B Rebhun
Journal:  Vet Comp Oncol       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 2.613

4.  Frequency and Severity of Neutropenia Associated with Food and Drug Administration Approved and Compounded Formulations of Lomustine in Dogs with Cancer.

Authors:  J H Burton; S D Stanley; H K Knych; C O Rodriguez; K A Skorupski; R B Rebhun
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 3.333

5.  Efficacy of omeprazole powder paste or enteric-coated formulation in healing of gastric ulcers in horses.

Authors:  K Birkmann; H K Junge; E Maischberger; M Wehrli Eser; C C Schwarzwald
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 3.333

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.